jwstephens at msm.umr.edu
Mon Jun 19 19:29:03 CDT 2006
Zane H. Healy wrote:
> Very nice! What are the physical dimensions of each page on the
> actual microfiche? Also what resolution did you scan at?
> The scanner would be used for more than just microfiche, which makes
> the 8x10 capability desirable.
The physical dimensions on the fiche was such that there were 14 8 x 10
sheets across a fiche. I don't have
the fiche around to look at and measure.
remember 8 x 10 transparentcy is a huge amount of data at high
resolution. most film negatives
are no where near that big.
I bought the scanner I have to scan 5 x 7 glass photo negatives from the
1800's that are
in my family, and that is the largest format I have. I only ever used
and could afford
4 x 5 negative film when i was shooting anything larger than 220 roll
film, so I have
very little larger than that.
the scanner will handle legal size, I think but not photo transparencies
What I meant to say earlier was the the scans when I finished had the
same bit dimension
as if one had scanned 8.5 x 11 sheets of paper, black and white at 200
More information about the cctech