> wasn't the coco limited to 64k? Apps running in such > an environment would have to be pretty skimpy. The Coco could be expanded to 128K, and maybe higher, although it WAS intrinsically a 64K machine. Yes, I KNOW that there are exceptions, such as graphics, but 64K is plenty for most PROPERLY WRITTEN programs. Supercalc Wordstar, not MICROS~1 WEIRD "dBase II v the bilge pump"