ethan.dicks at gmail.com
Sun Sep 3 22:16:37 CDT 2006
On 9/4/06, Chuck Guzis <cclist at sydex.com> wrote:
> On 9/3/2006 at 8:57 PM Scott Quinn wrote:
> >I had heard that Apple did the DB-25 thing because the HD-50 hadn't been
> >standardized yet and they didn't have enough back-panel real estate on the
> >Plus for a 50-pin ribbon/Centronics type.
> Wonder why a DD50 wasn't used? Probably because the DB25 was cheap and
> easy to get?
Besides the fact that Sun was about the only vendor using the DD50,
there still isn't room for a connector that wide on the back of a Mac
More information about the cctech