Using old disks drives
Tony Duell
ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk
Tue Dec 4 15:33:26 CST 2007
>
> On Dec 3, 2007, at 12:22 PM, Richard wrote:
> > Then there's the power needs. An RL01 requires a helluva lot more
> > power to run on a regular basis than an RL01 emulator connected to a
> > PC and the MTBF is much, much higher with the emulator.
>
> I'm sorry, but I have to disagree on both counts. The fact that many
> of us have RL01 drives that are still working (without having been
> repaired) counters the MTBF argument, and an RL drive pulls something
I would also argue that MTBF is unimportant in a machine used for a
hobby.
I'd much rather have a machine that required minor maintenance/repair
every year or so (requiring, perhaps, that the fans be taken apart and
cleaned, or ta few TTL chips replaced) than one that ran for 3 yeasrs and
then failed in a catastrophic way (requriing the replacement of, say, a PC
motherboard or a modern hard disk).
Incidnetally, I feel this way about things other than computers. 'Sealed
for life' bearings are a pain. I'd rather go round every month with a
grease gun :-)
-tony
More information about the cctech
mailing list