Sixel graphics (was: Humpty Dumpty)
Allison
ajp166 at bellatlantic.net
Fri Feb 9 06:49:30 CST 2007
>
>Subject: Sixel graphics (was: Humpty Dumpty)
> From: Richard <legalize at xmission.com>
> Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 01:40:18 -0700
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>
>
>In article <0JD500346VGN4EW3 at vms040.mailsrvcs.net>,
> Allison <ajp166 at bellatlantic.net> writes:
>
>> Error! VT100 had sixel graphics as did VT220, 320 and 340 added color,
>> VT1200 as full graphics (xterm).
>
>Sorry, but I just don't think this is correct.
I meant Regis graphics, Sixel is a printer graphics protocal (As in LA75,
LA100 and others).
>VT100 docs (user guide and technical guide, both on bitsavers) do not
>mention sixel graphics at all. Paul Shuford's site has some
>discussion of what "sixel graphics" means and apparently different
>people use the term loosely to describe different things.
>
>The VT125 had ReGIS graphics capability, but this is not a VT100.
Totally incorrect as the Vt125 is a VT100 + the VT125 graphics plane.
So a VT125 is a vt100 but a VT100 is not a VT125 holds.
>The VT220 Programmer Reference Manual also does not mention sixel
>graphics, but you can download a font glyph definition and presumably
>with the right custom font you could display some sort of image, but
>its not "sixel graphics".
>
>The VT320, like the VT200 series, also had user-definable character
>sets. You can "fake" some graphics this way like you can with the
>VT220. See <http://vt100.net/dec/vt320/soft_characters>.
>
>I know all these DEC terminal models can become confusing, but trust
>me, I have been paying attention to which models support graphics.
><http://vt100.net/vt_history> gives these models as supporting
>graphics:
IT was VT105 I'd meant not the base VT100.
> VT55: primitive graphics capability
> VT105: VT100 + VT55 graphics capability
> <http://home.arcor.de/magnos/ccg/vt105/VT105.html>
> VT125: Graphics produced as a separate display from the text.
> (I am not sure what this means; a separate monitor
> required?)
It means the display was a two plane one for characters and one for
grpahics and they are displayed on the same tube. External monitor
is required for color though. My Vt125 and VT185 have this.
> VT240: B&W ReGIS graphics
> VT241: Color ReGIS graphics
> VT330: B&W ReGIS graphics
> VT340: Color ReGIS graphics
Read further the manual. Works fine on mine.
I prefer the DEC tubes as Real Terminals(tm) rather than PCs
running a poor emulation. I have used all of them in place AKA in
the terminal and printers engineering (in a former engineering life)
group makes it harder to remember all of them. It's also a problem
as I have a few one off firmware versions that were not produced.
Allison
More information about the cctech
mailing list