OK, now this is impossible (11/23+ and RL02-RLV12 problem)
ggs at shiresoft.com
Fri Apr 11 22:01:56 CDT 2008
It could be memory or it could be the fact that the RLV12 isn't quite
the same as the RL11 in the 11/04 from a software/driver perspective
and XXDP's driver isn't happy with the RLV12.
On Apr 11, 2008, at 7:50 PM, Bob Armstrong wrote:
> I have this 11/23+ system with an RL02 drive and the RLV12
> controller that
> won't boot XXDP. Attempting to boot XXDP v2.5 either halts at 000154
> during the initial boot, or gives ?RD ERR messages from XXDP. The
> is a little random - sometimes it halts at 154, sometimes you'll get
> a few
> ?RD ERRs and then it'll lock up, and sometimes you'll get far enough
> to get
> an actual prompt from the XXDP monitor, but even then you can't run
> anything. You just get more RD ERRs.
> OK, I know - bad drive or bad pack, right? Well, I've tried two
> RL02 drives and two different XXDP packs with the same results.
> Better yet,
> I've connected one of those RL02 drives to another -11 (this time a
> w/RL11) and that same drive with those same packs boots and runs
> with no
> complaints. The drive even passes all the ZRL??? diagnostics and
> can scan the entire pack and finds no bad sectors.
> Better yet, I have another RL02 pack with RSX-11M v3.5 and that
> boots and
> runs on the 11/23 with the same RL02 and RLV12 with no apparent
> Now that's really impossible - the same drive that won't boot XXDP
> will boot
> How can this be? It almost seems like it has to be a software
> with XXDP, but XXDP obviously works on a 11/23 and the RLV12/RL02.
> Is there
> some strange hardware compatibility or ECO issue with the RLV12 or the
> 11/23+? Is there something XXDP does with the drive that RSX doesn't?
> I'd run diagnostics on the RL subsystem, but I don't really have
> any other
> load path for XXDP on this system. I did pare the system down until
> are only three cards in the backplane - CPU, memory and RLV12. No
> joy. And
> just on a whim I tried a different cable for the RL02 - still no joy.
> Thanks much,
> Bob Armstrong
More information about the cctech