Closed vs. open source timeline.
RichA at vulcan.com
Thu Aug 21 12:44:56 CDT 2008
From: Paul Koning
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2008 7:57 AM
> >>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Back <andy at smokebelch.org> writes:
> Andrew> So whilst the GNU project was announced in 1983 I've
> Andrew> heard many examples being cited of the source to
> Andrew> software being shared prior to this, E.g. IBM's VM up
> Andrew> to vN.N. And indeed recall reading somewhere that up
> Andrew> until a certain point in time the source to most if not
> Andrew> all software was available. As vendors made their money
> Andrew> from hardware sales and you were unlikely to be able to
> Andrew> buy a clone or build a machine yourself, and so
> Andrew> safe-guarding source code was not a major concern.
> I'm not sure if that's really accurate.
> To take some examples I know:
> DEC distributed its PDP-11 software in binary form when
> possible. Some had to be in source form -- BASIC-PLUS
> components of RSTS, for example, or source modules that had to
> be assembled on site to customize things for a particular
> installation. ("Sysgen") But apart from those, a listing
> license would cost you extra, and a source license would cost
> you a whole lot extra (like 5-10x the binary license price).
> And in any case, no matter what the form of distribution,
> everything was subject to restrictive licenses and copyrights.
The PDP-11 is rather a late example in DEC's history.
DECSYS-7 was distributed with source, for example, as were the
PDP-6 and PDP-10 monitors (which eventually became Tops-10, and
was a source distribution through v7.04--in 1988). I believe
that TSS-8 and PS/8 were distributed as source, though OS/8 may
have had an extra license fee. (I could easily be wrong about
the PDP-8 software.)
Server Engineer, PDPplanet Project
505 5th Avenue S, Suite 900
Seattle, WA 98104
mailto:RichA at vulcan.com
(206) 465-2916 cell
More information about the cctech