Language-specific CPUs was Re: uIEC/SD == AWESOME!
Allison
ajp166 at bellatlantic.net
Wed Dec 31 23:49:33 CST 2008
>
>Subject: Language-specific CPUs was Re: uIEC/SD == AWESOME!
> From: Cameron Kaiser <spectre at floodgap.com>
> Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 13:27:08 -0800 (PST)
> To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
>
>> (Interesting question, though - I wonder what a CPU might look like where you
>> could just throw C source code at it, for instance :)
>
>Well, there *was* the AT&T Hobbit:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AT%26T_Hobbit
>
>Not quite that, but still optimized for C, allegedly. Never worked with
>the architecture myself.
>
C was written for or about the PDP-11. Just about all the C addressing
modes and basic OPs are native for pdp11 addressing and many instructions.
Then we have the WD Pascal Microengine that basically was the implementation
of P-code in microcode.
There are machines that are coded for forth primitives directly.
I believe somewhere there was or is a a Java engine.
Memory says there was a Wang machine that directly executed Basic.
Generally it was not uncommon but most were lost to time.
Allison
>--
>------------------------------------ personal: http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ --
> Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com * ckaiser at floodgap.com
>-- Immigration is the sincerest form of flattery. -- Jack Paar ----------------
More information about the cctech
mailing list