"CP/M compatible" vs. "MS-DOS Compatible" machines?

[Liam Proven]

On 03/02/2008, Roy J. Tellason <rtellason at verizon.net> wrote:
> On Thursday 31 January 2008 10:07, Allison wrote:
> > Whats more interesting is there was nothing to prevent a termcap file
> > and later improved CP/M work alikes did exactly that and many more things.
>
> What sort of stuff would you put into the category of "CP/M work alikes"?

Closest thing that comes to mind was Chris Pile's "Pro-Dos" for the
MGT SAM Coupe:

http://www.samcoupe-pro-dos.co.uk/whatisprodos.html

Used no DR code but was compatible enough to rum CP/M <=2.2 apps.

I seem to recall hearing of others, though.

-- 
Liam Proven • Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/liamproven
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk • GMail/GoogleTalk/Orkut: lproven at gmail.com
Tel: +44 20-8685-0498 • Cell: +44 7939-087884 • Fax: + 44 870-9151419
AOL/AIM/iChat: liamproven at aol.com • MSN/Messenger: lproven at hotmail.com
Yahoo: liamproven at yahoo.co.uk • Skype: liamproven • ICQ: 73187508