A sign of the times. (Laserjet 4000s here)
Jim Battle
frustum at pacbell.net
Sat Jan 26 09:05:31 CST 2008
Stroller wrote:
...
> I have a similar conundrum here.
I fail to see the conundrum here.
> My father & I have about half-a-dozen Laserjet 4000s which fail to pick
> the paper properly. The problem can easily be isolated to the rubber
> "pick up" roller at the front of the tray - measured with a micrometer a
> good one is a hair's breadth larger in diameter than one that is worn.
>
> These are / were fantastic printers - I think the 4-series had a monthly
> duty-cycle of 65,000 pages, so I assume these are similar in
> specification. The HP engineers intended for this part to be easily
> replaceable, and you can easily pick up a roller set on eBay.
Sounds great so far -- you have a supply of fantastic printers that have
a minor problem. You aren't looking to sell them it sounds like ... you
simply wish they'd work better so you could use them. OK so far.
> Unfortunately the price comes to about £12 per tray - or perhaps £25
> shipped for rubbers for both lower trays plus the manual feed pickup,
> too - and these printers have a resale value of only £35.
You lose me here. Who cares about the resale value. What matters is
what is the value to you. If you can get a fantastic laser printer back
in operating condition for £25 with little effort, it sounds like a no
brainer to me.
> I think it's tragic to be throwing out such decent & solidly-constructed
> printers in favour of cheap plastic rubbish - in the event a repair is
> necessary the kind of printers we can get for less money will complain
> about disassembly with the "pling" of flying broken-plastic sproggets -
> but it makes little economic sense to do otherwise. I've been meaning
> the last week to try & find a source of Laserjet rollers where I can
> purchase 10 or 20 at more sensible rates, but I'm not overflowing with
> optimism.
This sentiment only reinforces the idea that *you* value your printers
at much more than £35.
Here is the way to think about it. Say you had no printer, and someone
offered you one of two deals
(1) A used but fully functional HP laserjet 4+ for £25
(2) A cheap plastic rubbish printer for £35
That really is your choice.
Even ignoring option #2, you say you can get your printer back in
working shape for £25, and the market value of that repaired printer is
£35. OK, repair yours and you save £10.
I don't see the conundrum.
> I'm inclined to think that in a few years time our current consumerist
> practices of throwing away hardware rather than repairing it will begin
> once again to look foolish, but in the meantime what's one to do?
Pick option (1) above.
More information about the cctech
mailing list