WaveMate Bullet history

[Andrew Burton]

Well, I'll own up to adding the links for Radio Shack and Tandy, as I was planning on adding some stuff about TRS-80's at a later date.
To my knowledge Tandy and Radio Shack were separate until around the time of the TRS-80's. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.


The whole Wiki site was set up about a year (or more) ago and like the knowledge-base pages has unfortunately been left pretty desolate :(
I started adding stuff after Mark de Jong asked me to help out with www.amigacoding.com which is also wiki-based.

However, time constraints and various projects have left me with little time for it lately :(


As for adding a line with no content behind it, you have to add dead links to be able to create the page. Or atleast, thats how I believe Wiki sites work. I am fairly new to Wiki stuff, so could be wrong on that too.


Regards,
Andrew B
aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk


Jim Battle <frustum at pacbell.net> wrote: Antonio Carlini wrote:
> Andrew Lynch wrote:
>> I wrote a Wikipedia page for the WaveMate Bullet.  I think it is a
>> noteworthy historical computer but apparently the people at Wikipedia
>> disagree.
> 
> Put in the classiccmp wiki:
> 
>   http://classiccmp.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page

I don't get it.  I went to that page and there are nothing but dead 
links.  What is the point of putting in a line item for a machine when 
there is no content behind it?

 http://classiccmp.org/wiki/index.php/Microcomputers

There isn't a single link there that has *anything* on it.  (And it is 
silly to have separate sections for Radio Shack and Tandy.)

What is the intent of the page at all?  Is the idea that there is 
someone waiting to write a document containing information that isn't 
already copiously available via google or wikipedia, but the thing 
holding them back is access to a blank page?  Like I said, I don't get it.