als at thangorodrim.de
Mon Nov 24 18:29:45 CST 2008
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 05:56:12PM -0600, Jules Richardson wrote:
> Chuck Guzis wrote:
> >Why don't those metrificated folks outside of the US talk about 133
> >mm, 89 mm and 203 mm floppies?
> Heh... because it'd be incredibly confusing?
> What I want to know is when the US and Canada will get with the program and
> start using ISO paper sizes like everyone else :-)
> Re. floppy sizes, I don't think I've ever heard anyone say 5" floppy,
> however computer illiterate. I believe I have heard 5 1/2" thrown about (to
> incorrectly mean 5 1/4") in the early days of 3.5" adoption.
There have been 3" floppies, IIRC used by some (Amstrad?) eletronic
"Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and
looks like work." -- Thomas A. Edison
More information about the cctech