some odds and ends to get rid of
Sridhar Ayengar
ploopster at gmail.com
Wed Oct 8 12:39:17 CDT 2008
Dave McGuire wrote:
>>> The 2501 in particular was discontinued in 2003. The last of the
>>> 2500 series, the 2525, was discontinued early last year, but it was a
>>> very different (modular) design.
>>>
>>> They 68030-based 2500 series was replaced by the PowerPC-based
>>> 2600 series.
>>>
>>> But as far as being the workhorse...most definitely yes. They're
>>> in datacenters everywhere, and will be for a very long time. They're
>>> capable, reliable, pull little power, generate little heat, and they
>>> just plain don't break.
>>
>> That's funny, the "workhorse" of all of the datacenters I've seen lately
>> are Cisco 6509's and 4948-10GE's, with a few older 3750 and 2950s
>> laying around for "legacy" stuff. I think you're calling
>> a "datacenter" what I'd call a "low end wiring closet". :)
>>
>> Hmm, I guess my environment has helped influence my hardware collecting
>> habits...
>
> You lead a charmed life, my friend. ;)
>
> But no, I was speaking more of "business computer rooms" than
> research-class datacenters. Perhaps I should've been more specific.
> Every now and then, I do some consulting work for small businesses,
> fixing broken network stuff. I see 2501s in production everywhere,
> terminating T1 lines, that haven't been touched (or rebooted for that
> matter) in a decade.
>
> If they ever go down, they'll likely be replaced by a cheap DSL
> circuit (for those whose inbound bandwidth requirement outstrips their
> outbound anyway), but most people don't seem to want to fix it if it
> isn't broken.
Here at IBM Poughkeepsie, there are still many 2500-series boxes in
various places. If I had to guess at a number, it would be in the range
of a hundred or so. Of course, we have many more 6500/7600-series boxes
than that, even.
Peace... Sridhar
More information about the cctech
mailing list