ENIAC vs. ENIAC-on-a-Chip IC implementation

[William Blair]

schwepes at moog.netaxs.com wrote:

> Why be surprised?  The second group had a far higher state
> of the art.
>
> > From the excellent book, "The First Computers - History and
> > Architectures," an interesting comparison:

I'm not at all "surprised" which is why I used the word "interesting."  The comparison given in the book is a great illustration of just how far the technology has come.  And, actually, it has come even quite a bit further since the ENIAC-on-a-Chip project was completed in 1997.