ENIAC vs. ENIAC-on-a-Chip IC implementation

[William Blair]

Brent Hilpert wrote:

> > Getting the 1946 documentation set would be a good
> start. CHM had the first
> > volume, which had a partial transcription on the chip
> web site which I've
> > scanned and put up under
> http://bitsavers.org/pdf/univOfPennsylvania/eniac
> 
> Thanks, that's far more info and detail than I've
> seen anywhere else to date.
> Looks like it may be most of what one needs for a machine
> definition, but have
> to study it more to see if one can derive
> 'everything' from it.

The 207 page ENIAC patent is pretty detailed:

http://www.fh-jena.de/~kleine/history/machines/EckertMauchly-ENIAC-us-patent-3120606.pdf