Ones' complement adder/subtractor
cclist at sydex.com
Sat Oct 2 14:23:19 CDT 2010
On 2 Oct 2010 at 11:52, Eric Smith wrote:
> I'm confused. Which patent are you saying should qualify as prior art?
> The Sun patent is fairly recent, so it can't qualify as prior art with
> respect to the older patents we've mentioned.
It's hard to believe that the approach used in the Sun patent hadn't
been used commercially before. That's what I meant by "prior art".
More information about the cctech