at&t unix pc
ethan.dicks at gmail.com
Thu Oct 14 12:43:49 CDT 2010
On 10/14/10, Eric Smith <eric at brouhaha.com> wrote:
> Ethan wrote about the AT&T Unix PC (7300 or 3B1):
>> It makes one wonder then how hard it would be to rig up a card with a
>> Lance chip (7990) and either IDE or SCSI...
> There is plenty of I/O address space available.
Unsurprising (given 16MB of range), but good to have confirmed.
> Years ago I wire-wrapped a card with a 5380 SCSI chip.
That would be when I would start - and maybe consider a WD33C93 (as
found in the Amiga 3000) if the performance of the 5380 turned out to
be an issue.
> I never got to the stage of having a reliable driver.
Ah. Out of curiosity, did you happen to write it from scratch or did
you have existing UNIX 5380 drivers to "borrow" from?
> A wire-wrap board won't fit into the computer itself; it took up three slots of an expansion box.
That can be addressed with a real PCB prototype, but I probably
wouldn't personally invest in a run of boards until driver issues were
> One impediment to making cards for the Unix PC is that the 99-pin
> three-row DIN-style connector is no longer made. If I remember
> correctly, one actually needs some of the contacts at both ends, but
> perhaps one could butcher two 96-pin DIN 41612/IEC 60603-2 connectors
> into a single 99. I haven't studied the mechanical drawings of the
> connectors to figure out how much the connectors would need to be hacked.
That is unfortunate - enough to make the whole process difficult.
Perhaps a CPU-socket design is worth considering. 64 pin DIP sockets
are still available. ;-)
More information about the cctech