Whitechapel Computer Works MG-1
cclist at sydex.com
Sun Nov 30 19:21:59 CST 2014
On 11/30/2014 04:54 PM, Jules Richardson wrote:
> How did they compare in price with the m68k? Because that chip (pretty
> much) "just worked", so if the price was comparable then I can certainly
> see why it gained such acceptance and the ns32k line fell by the wayside.
I never got to that point--the NSC chip was so late that it wasn't even
a candidate. I seem to recall some discussion that the early 16032
chips were a little on the flaky side, but that may have been rumor.
More information about the cctech