Whitechapel Computer Works MG-1

Chuck Guzis cclist at sydex.com
Sun Nov 30 19:21:59 CST 2014

On 11/30/2014 04:54 PM, Jules Richardson wrote:

> How did they compare in price with the m68k? Because that chip (pretty
> much) "just worked", so if the price was comparable then I can certainly
> see why it gained such acceptance and the ns32k line fell by the wayside.

I never got to that point--the NSC chip was so late that it wasn't even 
a candidate.  I seem to recall some discussion that the early 16032 
chips were a little on the flaky side, but that may have been rumor.


More information about the cctech mailing list