Paired 68000 systems for fault tolerance - was Re: out-of-mainstream minis
toby at telegraphics.com.au
Sat Jul 4 10:09:20 CDT 2015
On 2015-07-03 11:13 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
> On 07/03/2015 09:11 PM, Toby Thain wrote:
>> On 2015-07-03 8:09 PM, Glen Slick wrote:
>>> Apollo is the classic example of using plain 68K (two).
>> I always associate it with Tandem:
> Not sure what you are referring to, here. Tandem did not use 68K
> processors as the main CPU
> in any of their machines. (There could, possibly, have been 68Ks in
> some of the peripherals.)
Yes, you are right. The report gives some examples of dual 68000's in
Tandem's peripheral subsystems.
I likely was thinking of Stratus, because I remember reading this before:
Also Sequioa, who also used two 68000's operating in lockstep, described
in P.A. Bernstein's paper that is comprehensively paywalled :(
> They had their own 16-bit mini architecture, loosely based on HP's stack
> oriented minis.
More information about the cctech