Qbus split I&D?
bqt at update.uu.se
Wed Mar 18 12:29:52 CDT 2015
On 2015-03-18 17:57, John Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:16:02AM -0400, Noel Chiappa wrote:
>> The UNIBUS map will not respond to UNIBUS cycles in the address range
>> assigned to the UNIBUS memory.
> Just to state the obvious: I assume the whole point of this "Unibus fence"
> concept is really for things that *aren't* memory. Mixing in some Unibus
> memory that's slower than PMI etc. and needs to use real addresses for DMA
> (vs. mapped ones) seems like a giant hassle for just 6.5% more RAM, so I
> figure it's really for bus windows or ROM boards or frame buffers or any
> oddball device that looks like memory and is too big to fit in the I/O page.
(And it's not giving you more RAM. PMI memory already gives you 4M minus
the I/O page)
More information about the cctech