cctech Digest, Vol 44, Issue 10
phb.hfx at gmail.com
Fri May 11 13:23:47 CDT 2018
On 2018-05-11 2:37 PM, John Ames via cctech wrote:
>> Looking at modern hard disks, I'm unconvinced we could even mass-produce
>> something like that today.
>> A 40mm radius is comparable to a 3.5" disk, which are generally 5,400-7,200
>> RPM. 15,000 RPM is the fastest available, but those tend to be low-capacity and
>> expensive, and are often 2.5" drives with a huge heatsink. We could perhaps
>> rotate a very narrow smaller cylinder faster still but then the capacity
>> suffers further, and the seek time would start to dominate.
> I Am Not An Engineer(tm) but it seems to me that a taller cylinder
> should be less prone to wobbling on its axis than a flat disk,
> particularly if it's built at the scale of the drums I've seen at the
> CHM where there's room enough to really bolt that sucker down. Bit
> different than a 3.5" box with a stack of thin metal platters in it,
> I'd think.
They are not even metal platters anymore they have been glass for
several years now, glass is more rigid and can apparently be made
smoother than metal.
More information about the cctech