spacewar at gmail.com
Thu Sep 6 13:11:08 CDT 2018
On 09/06/2018 09:37 AM, Carlo Pisani via cctalk wrote:
> cause it's the simples, I guess
The VT100 was quite complicated compared to contemporary terminals at the
time of its introduction.
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 10:22 AM, Grant Taylor via cctalk <
cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
> I used to naively think that the VT100 was the lowest end Video Terminal.
> Then I subsequently saw references to VT50 and VT52. So now I have no clue.
If you think those were crude, take a look at the VT05, DEC's first
standalone serial video terminal.
More information about the cctech