2.11 BSD on an 11/93 with an CMD SCSI Module

Bill Gunshannon bill.gunshannon at hotmail.com
Wed Apr 3 11:32:21 CDT 2019


On 4/2/19 11:21 PM, Glen Slick via cctalk wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 5:09 PM Bill Gunshannon via cctalk
> <cctalk at classiccmp.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Try deleting everything on the device entry lines after "cnxint"
>>>
>>> (For reference, "cnrint" and "cnxint" are the names of the interrupt
>>> handler routines in src/sys/pdp/cons.c  Those names have to match to
>>> be able to link up the pointers to the interrupt handlers).
>>>
>>
>> Let's make it simple.  Here's that section of my dtab file:
>>
>> # If you have DL11s, you must give each line an explicit unit number instead
>> # of using a '?' as above.  If you use a '?', autoconfig(8) will start
>> # assigning unit numbers starting at 0 which will effectively move your
>> # console to that first line.  Start your unit numbers with '1'.
>> #
>> # cn    1 176500 300    5       cnrint  cnxint  # kl/dl-11 (on mvx11-aa)
>> cn      1 176500 300    5       cnrint  cnxint
>> cn      2 176510 310    5       cnrint  cnxint
>> cn      3 176520 320    5       cnrint  cnxint
>> cn      4 176530 330    5       cnrint  cnxint
>> cn      5 176540 340    5       cnrint  cnxint
>> cn      6 176550 350    5       cnrint  cnxint
>> cn      7 176560 360    5       cnrint  cnxint
> 
> Hmm, I spent some time experimenting with this on a SIMH PDP-11 and it
> appears that the device entry lines in /etc/dtab cannot end exactly at
> the last character of an interrupt handler name. At least one
> isspace() character is required before the newline character at the
> end of the line. I would consider that a bug in the read_dtab()
> routine in src/sys/autoconfig/read_dtab.c
> 
> These are the device entry lines I ended up adding to /etc/dtab to
> ensure that there is at least one isspace() character before the
> newline character at the end of the line. The '#' comment character
> isn't necessary, just makes it obvious that there is at least one
> isspace() character after the last interrupt handler name.
> 
> cn      1 176500 300    5       cnrint  cnxint  #
> cn      2 176510 310    5       cnrint  cnxint  #
> cn      3 176520 320    5       cnrint  cnxint  #
> cn      4 176530 330    5       cnrint  cnxint  #
> cn      5 176540 340    5       cnrint  cnxint  #
> cn      6 176550 350    5       cnrint  cnxint  #
> cn      7 176560 360    5       cnrint  cnxint  #
> 
> After changing the NKL definition in the kernel configuration file and
> rebuilding and installing a new kernel with that change I now get this
> when booting the system:
> 
> November  1 10:44:01 init: configure system
> 
> ra 0 csr 172150 vector 154 vectorset attached
> rl 0 csr 174400 vector 160 attached
> rx 0 csr 177170 vector 264 attached
> tms 0 csr 174500 vector 260 vectorset attached
> cn 1 csr 176500 vector 300 attached
> cn 2 csr 176510 vector 310 attached
> cn 3 csr 176520 vector 320 attached
> cn 4 csr 176530 vector 330 attached
> cn 5 csr 176540 vector 340 attached
> cn 6 csr 176550 vector 350 attached
> cn 7 csr 176560 vector 360 attached
> erase, kill ^U, intr ^C
> 
> To create the device nodes for the additional DL lines in /dev I then
> did the following:
> 
> # cd /dev
> # rm ttyl*
> # ./MAKEDEV dl1 dl2 dl3 dl4 dl5 dl6 dl7
> # ls -l ttyl*
> crw-------  1 root       0,   1 Nov  1 10:59 ttyl1
> crw-------  1 root       0,   2 Nov  1 10:59 ttyl2
> crw-------  1 root       0,   3 Nov  1 10:59 ttyl3
> crw-------  1 root       0,   4 Nov  1 10:59 ttyl4
> crw-------  1 root       0,   5 Nov  1 10:59 ttyl5
> crw-------  1 root       0,   6 Nov  1 10:59 ttyl6
> crw-------  1 root       0,   7 Nov  1 10:59 ttyl7
> 
> Then to enable getty to run on those addition DL lines I added entries
> for those device in /etc/ttys. There was already an entry for ttyl1 in
> /etc/ttys, but I had to change the 'off' to 'on' for that entry:
> 
> /etc/ttys new entries:
> ttyl1   "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600"   vt100           on secure
> ttyl2   "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600"   vt100           on secure
> ttyl3   "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600"   vt100           on secure
> ttyl4   "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600"   vt100           on secure
> ttyl5   "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600"   vt100           on secure
> ttyl6   "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600"   vt100           on secure
> ttyl7   "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600"   vt100           on secure
> 
> After making all of those changes and restarting the system I got
> login prompts on the additional DL lines after exiting single user
> mode.
> 
> In summary the only changes I had to make from the generic 2.11BSD
> installation were:
> (1) Change the  NKL definition in the kernel configuration file and
> rebuild and install a new kernel with that change
> (2) Add new 'cn' device entries for the additional DL lines in /etc/dtab
> (3) ./MAKEDEV dl1 ... dl7 in /dev for the additional DL lines
> (3) Add additional ttyl1 ... ttyl7 entries for the additional DL lines
> in /etc/ttys
> 

The baby steps continue.

I made the changes recommended above adding a space and a "#"
to the end of each line.  autoconfig now recognizes them and
getty doesn't complain.. No logi prompt but that could be a
cable problem as the only DEC serial cable I had handy was
labeled "Printer" and might not work.  I will dig up some of
my MMJ DB9 and DB25 connectors and make a real serial cable
to see if it now works.

Networking works fine.  I have been able to access the INTERNET
and login from a remote system.  This will make it much easier
to move things over to the PDP-11.  Probably make a dump of
the system and start applying patches.

Warren, when I get it done I will be glad to provide you with
a dump of the root and usr partitions.  I may be able to do
SIMH disk images as well, but I have been working mostly with
E11.  But I do SIMH as well sometimes.

I want to take this time to thank everyone who helped me get
this far.  It is fun to work with a real box again.  Next
step will be to use this one to make the necessary pieces
for Ultrix-11.  Eventually I would like to create a complete
VTServer install for Ultrix-11 as I expect more and more
people with real 11's are running without real tape drives.

bill



More information about the cctech mailing list