PDP-11 Memory

Jerry Weiss jsw at ieee.org
Sat Jan 12 12:13:52 CST 2019


On 1/12/19 11:39 AM, Bill Gunshannon via cctalk wrote:
> On 1/12/19 12:29 PM, Pete Turnbull via cctalk wrote:
>> On 12/01/2019 01:24, Zane Healy via cctalk wrote:
>>
>>> I’m pretty sure you could get the /23+, /53, /73, /83, and /93 in
>>> either a BA23 or a BA123.  I have an actual badged BA23 pedestal for
>>> my /23+.
>> I'm fairly certain all microPDP-11/23+ systems were only sold in BA23
>> boxes, and I think microPDP-11/73 and the later, cheaper, cut-down 11/53
>> were as well.  But almost all the 11/83 systems I've ever seen were in
>> BA123 boxes, though they did sell some in BA23 pedestals - I've got one.
>>
> One confusing part of this.  Everything I have read today
> seems to say that the only difference between the 11/73
> and the 11/83 in a MicroPDP-11 was the memory used.
> QBUS = 11/73
> PMI = 11/83
>
I use this guide in general - 
http://web.frainresearch.org:8080/projects/pdp-11/dcj11.php to 
understand the key differences in DEC DCJ11 implementations. You can see 
how the clock speed, caching and memory type drove differences in 
performance and marketing labels.

The 11/83 (M8190-AD or AE) with Non-PMI memory is just a slow 11/83 in 
my view. I know RT11 did report it as an 11/73.   It could be that from 
a software perspective, RT11 might not be possible to determine the 
actual module in use.

Does the 2MB 11/93 not work with and extra 2Mb of QBUS Non-PMI memory?  
I would have thought the upper 2MB would still be addressable, if for 
nothing else than for compatibility memory mapped display controllers 
and such.

    Jerry










More information about the cctech mailing list