Question about "Distributed" in the DFT name.
dkelvey at hotmail.com
Mon Nov 18 12:14:51 CST 2019
An interesting article but he never mentioned cost. Using TV available components cut cost.
From: cctalk <cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org> on behalf of Grant Taylor via cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2019 10:04 AM
To: cctalk at classiccmp.org <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: Question about "Distributed" in the DFT name.
On 11/18/19 10:37 AM, Al Kossow via cctalk wrote:
> odd message.. no body..
Operator error. - Multiple messages trying to start a new thread
instead of polluting another thread.
Let's try this again.
On 11/18/19 9:47 AM, Jay Jaeger via cctalk wrote:
> I am no expert on the CUT or DFT protocols.
Does the "Distributed" in "Distributed Function Terminal" refer to /
mean the same thing as the "Distributed" in "Distributed Systems", which
are also known as "Open Systems"?
> first generation displays were very dumb, later generations were
> intelligent and could parse the data stream allowing the creation of
> multiple virtual displays along with graphics. these are the ones with
> a 25th status row
> Ken just wrote a blog post about this trying to defuse the nonsense on
> the web about the reason why terminals are 80 x 25
I read and enjoyed Ken's article last week. I found it to be very
Grant. . . .
unix || die
More information about the cctech