Question about "Distributed" in the DFT name.
cctalk at gtaylor.tnetconsulting.net
Mon Nov 18 12:43:20 CST 2019
On 11/18/19 11:24 AM, Al Kossow via cctalk wrote:
> not really, all it meant was there was some intelligence at the terminal
> it wasn't capable of any sort of user-programmable computation
Sounds like distributed is just a term collision then. Thank you for
> that changed pretty quickly with the wide adoption of the IBM PC
> I came across a document recently that showed
> what a mess IBM had on their hands in 1984
Grant. . . .
unix || die
More information about the cctech