jnc at mercury.lcs.mit.edu
Tue Oct 15 10:07:17 CDT 2019
> From: Chuck Guzis
> One could argue that it's just as similar to FORTRAN (cf. computed GOTO
> and logical IF statements).
It probably worth pointing out that I never used COBOL, and have little
knowledge of it. So when one reads "it is vaguely reminiscent of COBOL, as it
has a 'Data Division' and a 'Procedure Division'", I must have copied that
all from some source I found, because I don't know what the 'Data Division'
and a 'Procedure Division' are (although I can guess from the names).
> Where it differs mainly from FORTRAN of the times is a facility for
> record layout
I seem to recall that COBOL was the first language with support for
structures? If DIBOL has support for them too, which would be another
similarity between the two.
More information about the cctech