DEC PDP-8/E wanted - still looking

Tom Hunter ccth6600 at gmail.com
Fri Nov 27 05:07:47 CST 2020


Hi Dave,

Thanks for Bob Armstrong's old email.

I have not seen Jim's VHDL code, but I am quite confident I can fix this.
Tom Urban wrote that the IOB6120 is misbehaving, so I will have to do some
fault finding or debugging anyway.
I would appreciate a short Fortran code snippet which reproduces the
problem.
I don't really want to have to learn how to play Adventure to reproduce
this. Games are not my thing except maybe chess.

Best regards
Tom Hunter

On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 6:29 PM <dave.g4ugm at gmail.com> wrote:

> Tom,
>
> This is the e-mail I got from Bob Armstrong..
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> =====================================================================
>
>
>
> *From:* sparetimegizmos at yahoogroups.com [
> mailto:sparetimegizmos at yahoogroups.com <sparetimegizmos at yahoogroups.com>]
> *Sent:* 15 July 2015 15:53
> *To:* sparetimegizmos at yahoogroups.com
> *Subject:* RE: [sparetimegizmos] Any builders of the SBC6120 in the UK
>
>
>
>   The FORTRAN RTS uses interrupts, whereas most OS/8 software does not,
> and so it reveals bugs that are not otherwise apparent.
>
>
>
>   As I recall the problem was with the VGA/PS2 console implementation in
> the FPGA.   Jim didn’t handle clearing the flags and the interrupt request
> quite correctly, and it made FORTRAN hang up in an interrupt loop.   It
> should be easy enough to fix by revising the VHDL, but I’m not sure Jim
> ever did.  Make sure you have the latest IOB6120 firmware.
>
>
>
>   FWIW,  FORTRAN does work with the SBC6120 onboard serial console enabled
> so you can use the IOB so long as you’re not using the VGA console.
>
>
>
>   This was an issue for many people because it broke the ADVENTure game,
> which is also written in FORTRAN :-)
>
>
>
> Bob
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Tom Hunter <ccth6600 at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* 27 November 2020 01:08
> *To:* Dave Wade <dave.g4ugm at gmail.com>
> *Cc:* General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts <
> cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> *Subject:* Re: DEC PDP-8/E wanted - still looking
>
>
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> Could you please explain how exactly the VT emulation "kills" the Fortran
> run time system in OS/8?
>
> What is the fault? How do you trigger it? Have you got a Fortran code
> snippet which reproduces the problem?
>
> Was there some previous discussion about it answering my questions above?
>
> I have a reasonable level of experience with VHDL and Xilinx ISE so maybe
> I can fix it if I can reproduce it.
>
> Thanks and best regards
>
> Tom Hunter
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 6:28 PM <dave.g4ugm at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Tom,
>
> If it has an IOB6120 then it the VT emulation kills the Fortran run time
> system in OS8.
>
> Dave
> G4UGM
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cctalk <cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org> On Behalf Of Tom Hunter via
> > cctalk
> > Sent: 26 November 2020 06:02
> > To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
> > <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> > Subject: DEC PDP-8/E wanted - still looking
> >
> >  Tom Uban fully built "Spare Time Gizmos" SBC6120 based computer
> > complete
> > with front-panel and IO board is on its way to me.   :-)
> >
> > I am still looking to buy one of the following PDP-8 models:
> >
> > PDP-8/F
> > PDP-8/E
> > PDP-8/L
> > PDP-8/I
> > PDP-8/M
> >
> > Dave, Chris, Paul and Robert I am looking forward to getting more details
> > from you.
> >
> > I am happy to pay a reasonable price for the right PDP-8, so a seller
> won't be
> > disappointed.
> >
> > Thanks and best regards
> > Tom Hunter
>
>


More information about the cctech mailing list