Both Xilinx and Microchip have linux builds of their tools. Also, news to me that Linux
or Windows FPGA tools cost money, not for "simple" devices see
https://www.fpgadeveloper.com/list-of-fpga-dev-boards-dont-require-license/ .
Note that "simple" devices are pretty complex : Artix, Zynq 030, UltraZynq 7EV,
etc see
https://www.amd.com/en/products/software/adaptive-socs-and-fpgas/vivado/viv…
As for PALs Lattice support for anything prior to the XO2's is priced at legacy
support rates, the users are expected to be performing long term support of obsolete
systems (cheaper to pay than redesign) for the obvious client list, I suspect the tools
would otherwise have been orphaned. Hard pressed to see what else you might use a PAL for
in 2025.
Martin
-----Original Message-----
From: ben via cctalk [mailto:cctalk@classiccmp.org]
Sent: 17 October 2025 08:27
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Cc: ben <bfranchuk(a)jetnet.ab.ca>
Subject: [cctalk] Re: Classic computing - earliest years
On 2025-10-17 1:06 a.m., Johan Helsingius via cctalk wrote:
On 17/10/2025 03:01, Fred Cisin via cctalk wrote:
Is there ANY reason why windows N can't work
with legacy drivers from
Windows N-1?
Not really. See how *BSD and even Linux supports really old hardware.
I would turn the question around. Is there any reason to use Windows?
:)
Julf
FREE Fpga and pal software.
Unix versions are big money.
Ben.
PS:
GAMES is the correct answer.