For cars, I think most states offer the "classic car" designation at 20
years?
Search for "VCF Domesticating the Computer" for my VCF talk on an overview
of computing history (but yes, with more of a focus on the 1970s).
Towards the end is a white background chart where I try to show the
"merging" of minicomputers and microcomputers (that comes together with the
386 around 1986/1987). Elsewhere is a US government sponsored report,
indicating that 50% of households still didn't have a computer until
1992/1993.
But home/personal computer is just one slice of all this. VAX/VMS was
another established OS (around mid/late 1970s). CP/M (to my knowledge)
never broke the "64K barrier" -- I'm not sure if QDOS did either, but it
was at least a good enough baseline for PC/MS-DOS to later evolve towards
the more organic .EXE format.
It's ironic how I think Microsoft internally was said to be adamant about
not calling it "DOS" and using "MS-DOS" consistently (in
documentation,
discussions, ads, etc). And yet, their software installed to C:\DOS :)
- Steve
On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 5:12 PM Murray McCullough via cctalk <
cctalk(a)classiccmp.org> wrote:
Hi everyone,
According to historians, and I consider myself one, let us consider what
classic/vintage computers were: The 1970s saw the three amigos: Apple II,
TRS-80 and Commodore PET and the OS was DOS and its ilk + CP/M. The 1980’s
saw the Dells, HPs and many others with MS-DOS & IBM PC-DOS from QDOS. We
saw this and behold ’bring on the clones’(I just had to say this!) The era
of old computers saw one generation building on the shoulders of giants who
designed these wayback computers(with apologies to Wayback Machine).
Today’s PCs and ARM machines are just the latest iteration of this
theory(by the way not mine).
Happy computing
Murray 🙂