test-drb October 2000

test-drb@ccmp.vtda.org

184 participants
568 discussions

by SUPRDAVE＠aol.com

In a message dated 10/21/00 10:42:36 AM Eastern Daylight Time, fauradon(a)mn.mediaone.net writes: > Should I move to the shed and store the computers in the bedroom? hmm, the answer seems obvious here... DB Young ICQ: 29427634 hurry, hurry, step right up! see the computers you used as a kid! http://www.nothingtodo.org/classiccmp/museum.htm

25 years

Semi-OT: "Mining" Web Sites

by LFessen106＠aol.com

In a message dated Sat, 21 Oct 2000 12:21:09 AM Eastern Daylight Time, healyzh(a)aracnet.com writes: << OK, I've got a question that I'm really not sure how to go about looking for the answer to. I know that there used to be commercial products for the Mac that did this several years ago, but I think their long gone. Basically the platform the software runs on doesn't matter as long as it isn't Windows. I'm looking for a software package that can take a snapshot of a website for archival purposes and go 'x' levels deep. I want it to be able to snag stuff such as PDF documents. Zane >> You are looking for "wget" for Linux and it's (of course) free. -Linc Fessenden

25 years

95LX Connectivity Software

by spectre＠stockholm.ptloma.edu

Well, I got the HP 95LX Connectivity software for DOS and it doesn't work! (The disk says "Packed file is corrupt" when I run the install program. DOS 6.0 on a 486 laptop.) Does anyone have an install disk they can zip up and send me? I do have the disks, but they just don't work. -- ----------------------------- personal page: http://www.armory.com/~spectre/ -- Cameron Kaiser, Point Loma Nazarene University * ckaiser(a)stockholm.ptloma.edu -- All things are possible, except skiing through a revolving door. -----------

25 years

MMJ Info

by Mzthompson＠aol.com

On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Jerome Fine wrote: > > [Snip] > > The H8571-A and H8575-A are MMJ to DB25 (female) and are wired as follows: > > MMJ DB25 > > 1 20 > > 2 2 > > 3 7 > > 4 7 > > 5 3 > > 6 6 & 8 > > Also pins 4 & 5 of the DB25 are tied together > > I have used the above using a standard DEC BC16E cable to connect to > > a PC 25-pin serial port to use the PC as a terminal. > > Jerome Fine replies: > > I have one of the H8575-A, but have not yet done a continuity check to verify > the connections that you state. But I assume that you are correct. One of these > days I will attempt to verify that all of the above works with a VT320. Thank you. These adapters are listed in a few DEC manuals, so that is the primary source of the info. In most cases I have verified the info as well. > Any suggestions on how to verify the above? Can a simple tester do this? A simple VOM. The hard part is staying connected to the pins. To make that a little easier I use some adapters I picked up years ago. These are banana jacks to D connector pins & sockets. You can roll your own, but they are made by Pomona Electronics, p/n's 3560 & 3561. > > The H8571-C and H8571-F are MMJ to DB25 (male) and are wired as follows: > > MMJ DB25 > > 1 6 > > 2 3 > > 3 7 > > 4 7 > > 5 2 > > 6 20 > > I have an H8571-F as well. When I pried apart the DB25 from the housing, > that was what I found. I'm not one to say I told you so, but..... ;-) > > And here is a summary on how the various signal lines match up to > > each other on the different connectors. > > Term Term MMJ MMJ port on DEC > > DB25 DE9 computer or Decserver > > 20 4 1 --->-------------->----------------->--- 6 > > 2 3 2 --->-------------->----------------->--- 5 > > 7 5 3 ---------------------------------------- 4 > > 7 5 4 ---------------------------------------- 3 > > 3 2 5 ---<--------------<-----------------<--- 2 > > 6 6 6 ---<--------------<-----------------<--- 1 > > Seems very reasonable. And it does work since I also connected up two > VT320 terminals using two cables and one female DB25 and one male > DB25 (i.e. one H8575-A and one H8571-F) after I had used just a > single BC16E cable. > > However, I have two more VT320 terminals which I want to connect > and I don't have at least one H8571-F. I assume you meant "I don't have more than one H8571-F" If you need, I got a couple spares. > So here is the question. Since we have both found the cost of the H8575-A > and the H8571-F DB25 MMJ to DB25 connectors to be a bit high in the > price (i.e. more than we want to pay), would it be reasonable to cut the > cable in half and put an ordinary RJ11 phone connector on each cut > end to produce TWO cables? I also happen to have a couple of RJ11 > to DB25 connectors (male) to which I could then connect the newly mated > RJ11 normal style. That way, I would not need to have the DEC MMJ > connectors. However, there is one minor problem - you note that both > pins 3 and 4 are connected to DB25 pin 7! Must that be done? The problem > is that the RJ11 end has all 6 pins connected to 6 individual male components > and it will be a hassle to attempt to connect both of pins 3 and 4 of the RJ11 > to DB25 pin 7 - to say the least. May one be omitted and if so which one? I'll use the standard engineering answer. It depends. That is to say it depends on what you are trying to do. There are times where you only need certain lines, and there are times when you hook up all lines and it still won't work. I have had good luck in using just the transmit and receive data leads (MMJ 2 & 5 to DB25 pins 2 & 3, and of course ground) to use for example a PC as a terminal hooked to a DEC machine. If your going to hook a DEC machine up to a modem then you are going to need the control lines as well. On the other end, I attempted to use a Compaq portable one time as a terminal and it did not work. I figured the serial port was bad. Later when I tried again, I found that the port was fine, but still would not interface with a DEC machine. I decided the reason had to be due to the voltage levels. A standard serial (if it exists) as defined by RS232C should have a voltage swing from +15 (0) volts to -15 volts (1). Granted you will find it implemented at +/- 12v, +/- 9v, etc. These all work as the spec defines the threshold as 5v, between +5 and -5 is undefined and considered the transition zone. Now look at DEC, which uses DEC-423 which I assume is a derivative of RS423. The voltage swing for 423 is +6 to -6 volts with the threshold being 200 mv. I checked the DEC machine and sure enough it was running at 6v. I concluded the the Compaq was possibly designed with a higher threshold volatge, and was not going to recognize the 6v coming from the DEC machine. > I think that this should be possible since I also happened to find another > MMJ DB25 female connector which has the "funny" DEC offset, but > without the DEC name. In this case, I was also to pry the DB25 off the > housing and found that pin 3 in the MMJ side was left hanging and not > connected to anything. That's OK. Pin 3 & 4 are both ground on the MMJ. I'll bet MMJ-4 is connected to DB25-7, so there is the ground connection. > In addition, on the DB25 side, pin 6 was not > connected to pin 8. That should be OK, 6 - DSR Data Set Ready, 8 - Data Carrier Detect. Here again we are getting into modem control lines and may not be needed depending on what you are trying to connect. > I have not had a chance to test with both the DEC > (H8575-A) and the non-DEC DB25 female connectors with a VT320 > at each end, so I am not sure if the non-DEC version can be used. But > since the non-DEC (i.e. without the DEC label) has the "funny" DEC > offset, I feel I can assume that it will probably work - in point of fact, > I might have used that one when I did the VT320 to VT320 test. > > If my suggestion is possible, then it should be very easy to convert any > DEC BC16E cable into two cables with one end being used at the > VT320 and the other (after being fitted with a standard RJ11 connector) > to be used with a normal RJ11 to DB25 connector. Tongue in cheek. Oh my, he's gonna cut a BC16E cable into two pieces. What's next, testing chain saws on Mac's, or removing spare parts from heavy metal VAXen's with a propane torch. ;) > Just though I would ask for some advice and suggestion. Also, if anyone > has already done this, and it worked, then I would know it is going to be > OK. If there was something I should be aware of and it has already be > figured out, that would be helpful to know. Note that the VT320 terminals > will be used without a modem, so if all DEC parts were used, the BC16E > cable with an H8571-F would first be used to convert to a standard > DB25 male interface. Then a null modem cable would be used to connect > the DB25 male to the standard DB25 male on a DEC computer. The > key point is to attempt to become independent of the DEC "funny" offset > within the first cable connected to the VT320. The annoying part is that > I have a number of RJ11 to DB25 convertors without the "funny" DEC > offset plus a small amount of 6 and 8 wire cable that I can't use since > I first have to overcome the "funny" DEC offset. Jerome, it sounds like a plan. But I have to ask, why the mindset about the "funny" DEC offset? Is my perspective askew? By that I mean am I living near the land of plenty? I have gleened one building after a computer outfit moved out and hauled cables out in multiple 30 gallon garbage bags. Not all were MMJ cables, but got enough to do my thing. OTOH I understand, I have concocted my share of workarounds over the years. Mike

25 years

nice paper on Multics emacs

by mac＠Wireless.Com

http://www.best.com/~thvv/mepap.html As Eric pointed out, it's nice to keep the h/w, but it's even better if you can keep the s/w! (And, no, I don't know where to get a copy of Multics emacs...) -Mike C

25 years

Preserving a Multics System

by dhquebbeman＠theestopinalgroup.com

Here's an interesting datapoint about the cost of running a preserved/rescued Multics: > "NO UCE" <nouce(a)multics.ruserved.com> wrote in message > news:8s1ltb$sco$1@multics.ruserved.com... > > So how much would it cost to 'mothball' the hardware and store it? > > > > I'd ask how much it would cost to run a minimal system, 1 CPU, RAM, > > disk, etc, but I'm afraid of what the answer might be. > > > > The 1 CPU DPS-8/70M with 4 MW, 1 IMU, 1 18x FNP, 2 FIPS tapes, 3 FIPS D and > 1 FIPS E disk that we ran at CGI/Perigon/ACTC consumed around 1.1 MWhr of > electricity a day running mostly the idle program. Based on current utility > rates in Calgary, that translates to about $2,000 CDN per month. This > included the AC load added to the room. The configuration cited is not the > minimal. This is why emulators are needed for the really old stuff, even if it does still run. regards, -dq

25 years

NatSemi 32000

by xds_sigma7＠hotmail.com

I know a guy who worked on designing the Tektronics machine that used the NS32K family.. I've always wanted to ask him about the machine, design process, etc.. I also have the preliminary info on TI's 32000 products, since they second-sourced it.. I have the NS 32000 databook also.. Will J _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com.

25 years

Preserving a Multics System

by dhquebbeman＠theestopinalgroup.com

> > This is why emulators are needed for the really old stuff, even if > > it does still run. > > Yes, but for the emulator to be useful, someone has to *save* > the software to run on it, and the documentation. > > Even though this seems obvious, it's *amazing* how often it > doesn't happen. > > So is anyone archiving the software for this Mulitcs system? An archive of Multics exists at MIT. If my recent personal experiences with 9 track magtape can be considered representative and not anecdotal, then I think the tapes will still be readable even ten years from now. regards, -doug q

25 years

Last (or next to last) Multics System to be Decommissioned

by dhquebbeman＠theestopinalgroup.com

> And someone is going to acquire this hardware for posterity I assume?? Doubtful... this was a military machine, and although it didn't handle classified data, they didn't grant accounts to outsiders, which even the NSA did with the DOCKMASTER system until it was decomissioned in 1998. But maybe if someone with deep enough pockets and good Canadian connections tries, who knows what might be possible... -dq

25 years

Preserving a Multics System

by dhquebbeman＠theestopinalgroup.com

> Does anyone even know of any good DPS-8 information pages > anywhere on the net? There's a little bit on it at http://www.multicians.org but that's mostly covering the DPS-8/M. Actually, this site, managed by Tom Van Vleck (an original Multician), is a great example of how to organize a site to preserve info about a vintage platform. It's mostly simply text web pages, with links to some that have pictures. But the pages load quickly, and I think you'll be impressed by the volume of information. -doug q

25 years

← Newer
1
...
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
...
57
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

test-drb October 2000