I have three types of chips, in the quantities listed below, that I have
no idea what they do or what they are used in. The nearest I can speculate
is that they are for the Fairchild F8 processor. Anyone have additional
info? I can also donate these if someone has a pressing need...
Manufacturer is AMI and date codes are 1977 - 1982
QTY #Pins Part number
--- ----- -----------
4 40 S2350
5 28 SW20365K
16 28 SW20417K
If the two "SW" 28-pin jobs are "house numbers" and I can't find a reference,
I'll most likely pitch them...
Cheers,
-RK
--
Robert Krten, PARSE Software Devices +1 613 599 8316.
Realtime Systems Architecture, Consulting, Books and Training at www.parse.com
Looking for Digital Equipment Corp. PDP-1 through PDP-15 minicomputers!
Does anyone on the list have one of these or have experience with them?
I found two of them this morning in a scrap pile but passed them up since
there were no probes with them.
Joe
Went to an auction today and picked up a 1989 Sega Golden Axe arcade machine
that seems to work (not fully tested yet). Looks like it's Version 1 of the
game. There is some screen burn-in but it only cost $2.50 to win the bid so
I can live with it. It took 8 guys lifting it to help me load it into my van
and only two of us to unload it home. Anyone know the dip setting for free
play on the machine? Thanks
I have read all the posts very carefully over the last few days. Because Vaxen are not my specialty
I have to rely on other people's expertise in purchasing hardware. There seemed to be some debate
as to whether the KZQSA can be used or not for hard drives. Has anyone else reading this list
managed to conclude whether this will work or not? Will it fit in a BA23 cabnet? Will an RZ74 work
with the MicroVax II if the board fits and is suitably configured?
Thank you for a very interesting read about older DEC equipment.
Bradley Slavik
I have two HP400t's, a 425t, and a 425e, plusone 19" HP RGB monitor, free to
anyone in easy delivery area of CT (NY/NJ/MA/RI, maybe farther). A bit heavy
to ship, especially the monitor, but I might be willing to if needed.
Cleaning house,just looking to get rid of them.
Pete
Along with a plethora of PCI, ISA (and 1 EISA) token ring adapters, I have
three HP JetDirect token ring adapters (HP part# J2555-60003).
If there's any interest, let me know soon before they go off to the great
electronic recycler in the sky.
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
[ Old computing resources for business || Buy/Sell/Trade Vintage Computers ]
[ and academia at www.VintageTech.com || at http://marketplace.vintage.org ]
I'm a little steamed. I just received an email from Network Solutions
offering me a valuable new service: protection of my domain registration
information from spammers. For the cost of just $5, my WHOIS contact
information will be hidden so it can't be scraped by spammers and doesn't
appear in the lists and exports they routinely create from the whois
databases.
A couple things about this really piss me off. First, NSI doesn't say
explicitly, but it obvious during "checkout" on their site, that the cost is
$5.00 PER DOMAIN. If you are, for example, like me, a designated technical
contact for hundreds of domains that my customers register (often without my
knowledge, even), then the annual cost of preserving my privacy is
staggering.
Second, NSI claims on the "product" information for this "service" that
"ICANN requires this personal information to be available for anybody to
view on the web." If that is the case, then how is even possible for them
to charge me to not make my personal information public.
This "service" seems like a gross abuse of the collected data and a complete
breach of any ethics with respect to the handling of personal information
associated with a domain registration.
Am I being unreasonable about this?
Patrick
On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 13:14:39 -0800 Patrick Rigney <patrick(a)evocative.com>
wrote:
>I'm a little steamed. I just received an email from Network Solutions
>offering me a valuable new service: protection of my domain registration
At first it sounds like they're asking for protection money or something,
but think about this for a second.
Your contact information must be available so that people know how to
get in touch with you in the event of problems (I think there may even
be an RFC on this). However, this same availability makes you a target
for solicitation of great new offers.
So in addition to all the anti-harvesting-crawler stuff (the OCR resistent
gifs with one time access codes, etc), Registrars are offering a 'proxy'
service where your information is not listed...rather the domain is managed
by an abstracted management service that hides your real info and gives
you an anonymous identity for things related to the domain. (I don't
know if this is the way Netsol is doing it, but that's the way at least
2 others are doing it). As such, I can understand them charging for
this since it is actually a service and not just "we'll cover up your
info if you pay us".
Now having said that, network solutions stinks...even though all the
registrars seem to be getting better overall with all the competition.
-Mike
