> > Andrew wrote...
> > > BOG (no, not the toilet!)
> > Absolutely no clue.
>
>
Isn't there an expression: Bog standard
Which just means ordinary or stock configuration?
Kelly
Hi there,
Been lurking (and learning) for a few weeks here.
Lots of interesting topics for sure.
Do any of you have inverse assemblers for the HP1631D logic analyzer ?
Specifically, I am looking for the files that go with the 10342B interface
(RS232/422 and HPIB capable) but I'd also be interested in inverse
assemblers for any CPU. I have one to date.
BTW, the 1631D is connected to my PC using an HP disk drive
emulator written by a fella from the Yahoo HP group. The files
are therefore loaded and saved right from my PC via HPIB. The code
is pretty new but already functional. This meant reverse engineering
the CRC being sent from the original HP driver over the HPIB link - no
small job in itself.
This is my second attempt at posting on the list - I apologize if this
ends up being a duplicate post.
Regards to all,
Benoit Robert
--- Jay West <jwest at classiccmp.org> wrote:
> Andrew wrote...
> > BOG (no, not the toilet!)
> Absolutely no clue.
>
> > FGPA (I think that's right)
> Probably FPGA, or Field Programmable Gate Array.
> Think of it as a prom that
> you can program to be a processor, not just data.
>
Ahhh.
> > If there isn't already a definitions/terms list
> > on classiccmp.org could one be added?
> On first blush, I would think this untenable.
> There's just too many terms,
> and most are probably already there in places like
> wikipedia. But should we
> add one to the classiccmp website perhaps? I
> dunno...
>
> Jay
>
You are probably right. Just to clarify my
idea, I was thinking of a table that would
say list:
FPGA = Field Programmable Gate Array
After a quick view on the table someone
could then go to Wikipedia, Google or some
other search engine and search for:
"Field Programmable Gate Array"
which would produce alot more relevant results
then just searching for:
"FPGA"
Anyone think it might be useful now??
Regards,
Andrew B
aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk
From: Tom Watson <sdc695 at yahoo.com>
>
> Another tact might be to see if the sender HAS a port 25 on their
> machine. I suspect that the 'bot machines don't.
>
A number of very large mail providers split sending and receiving mail onto
different groups of machines, so you can't count on the sender listening for
mail.
Hi there,
Been lurking (and learning) for a few week here.
Lots of interesting topics for sure.
Do any of you have inverse assemblers for the HP1631D
logic analyzer ? Specifically, I am looking for the files that
go with the 10342B interface (RS232/422 and HPIB capable)
but I'd also be interested in inverse assemblers for any CPU.
BTW, the 1631D is connected to my PC using an HP disk drive
emulator written by a fella from the Yahoo HP group. The files
are therefore loaded and saved right from my PC via HPIB. The code
is pretty new but already functional. This meant reverse engineering
the CRC being sent from the original HP driver over the HPIB link - no
small job in itself.
Regards to all,
Benoit Robert
I thought I'd introduce myself. I'm Grant from Alaska. :) Any other
Alaskan's in here?
I'm new to the group, still a little new to "real" classic computers. I'm
the http://www.altairkit.com guy.
I really started getting into them back in 2004 when I wanted to build a
computer kit. I'd watched movies like "Pirates of Silicon Valley", read a
Bill Gates biography, built a few kits like a Veronica PLL/stereo coder,
but it still wasn't enough. I wanted to build a computer. Someone I knew
harassed me in a friendly way that all I was doing was assembling one from
a bag of parts. But it still meant something to me.
I started with the idea of using a Macintosh 128k as a building block. I
decapped a few of the PALs to read out the fusemap, but gave up the project
after reading about Apple going after people for providing copies of System
1.0-5.0 on their web sites. I then started on the Apple-1. I worked on
and off on that, until January 2006 when I found that a guy named Steve
Gabaly beat me to it. I was able to quickly give up the idea and move onto
an Altair - AND buy his Apple-1 kit. : ) What would make the Altair
easier is actually being able to buy and hold a working machine in my
hands. I didn't have access to an Apple-1 except for some high resolution
PCB scans.
I'm going to copy and paste a part of my web page into here for the sake of
indexing robots. If 50 years from now my web site is down someone might
want the full story. ;)
See the link below for the story wtih pictues, otherwise look for the
=========s for my intruduction to resume! : )
http://www.altairkit.com/creation_of_a_kit_story.html
--------------------------
So an Apple I kit is out of the question, it's been done! My next favorite
computer is the Altair, and it is actually obtainable! I found an Altair
for sale with quite a few extra memory and I/O boards. It was in fairly
good condition and had a few manuals, so I was happy. The D0 switch didn't
work so I couldn't actually toggle in any programs, and in fact I never
fixed that switch before completely disassembling the entire computer!
The best part about the Altair that I had just bought was that it had been
used by ARP Instruments as part of an experimental computerized music
synthesis project. Included with it was a bunch of documentation on synth
control, some disks containing the code, and some custom interface
cards. I love time capsules, but the ARP story is for another day...
http://www.altairkit.com/images/061118-ARP_unpacked_2597.jpg
The ARP Instruments Altair - its alive...sort of...
I began the project not wanting to "destroy" my Altair. I had after all
paid a lot of money for it! Todd Fischer replied to me in an e-mail "One
flag comes up that suggests that you're not as committed to this idea as
you seem. When you write "I'm not interested in the project enough to buy
a perfectly working Altair just to desolder all of the parts!", it tells me
that you are limited in your intent.". I stuck to the idea of not
desoldering the Altair for a good 5 months! In the mean time I had sent
away some pictures of the CPU board to several companies that offered "Raw
PCB to Gerber" conversion. That is where a raw PCB is placed on a
calibrated high resolution scanner. With the aide of a human, the computer
recreates the copper, drill, silkscreen, and solder mask (if present)
Gerber cad files. I received responses that ranged from $200 to
$1300. Since that was JUST for the CPU card and I had quite a few that
needed to be reproduced, I decided to try "scanning" myself. I attempted
to do this quite a few times using different software packages.
Just to show you how hard I tried to avoid disassembling my original Altair
boards... Since I work for a company that produces digital x-ray
equipment, it was easy to get x-rays of the MITS boards. I actually
scanned the bottom of the board, made that layer of the board translucent,
and then overlayed the x-ray. This looked pretty good, but it is a LOT of
work to "scan" a board by "tracing" the traces! It was pretty neat being
able to see the traces that were underneath the ICs...even the traces under
the dies! Quality is important to me, and I wanted boards that were as
close to the original MITS boards as possible. I finally decided to turn
to the PCB scanning outfits...
http://www.altairkit.com/images/061118-Altair_8800_CPU_BD_Rev0-Composite.jpg
The scanned/x-ray composite Altair CPU board. This is a scaled
version. The file I was using was 300dpi.
In the end, I decided to use <http://www.mhtest.com/>Mile High Testing
Services to scan my boards. They were second to the cheapest and their web
page made me feel confident. (If you contact them, tell Steven that Grant
says "Hi"!) This involved me desoldering every single part off of the
boards and then cleaning off all the solder/flux. See a pattern
here? Someone gives me good advice and I try to take a different
direction. ;) Advice from Steve Gabaly, creator of the Apple 1 kit, went
like this "...if I were going to make an Altair I'd have the boards
reproduced by a PCB scanning service and get a perfect set of boards in a
few weeks with no hassle..."
It wasn't QUITE "no hassle" because of the poor quality silkscreen on the
original MITS boards. After spending an average of 10 hours on each PCB
cleaning up and restoring the silkscreen, my cad screen looked something
like this:
http://www.altairkit.com/images/061118-CPUBD_Gerber.jpg
The Altair CPU board Gerber file including my solder mask layer, the fonts
don't seem to render very well on screen...
I went through each PCB with a fine tooth comb. I repositioned all of the
silkscreen elements to where I thought the original intent would have
been. I also created a solder mask for the PCBs to improve appearance and
to make it easier to assemble. Here are some sample before and after
pictures of the 1k memory card. These don't show the worst cases, but are
still good comparisons.
http://www.altairkit.com/images/061007-2-88-1MCS_Right.jpg
MITS board on the left and reproduction board on the right
The MITS silkscreen was used where ever possible. Sometimes I had to copy
and paste letters/numbers from other parts of the board. Quite a few times
the first letter was on top of a pad, etc. I also shrunk the symbols so
they would fit between the pads. The arrows now point to pin one instead
of being on top of pin 2, etc...
Before I found <http://www.pcbnet.com/>Imagineering Inc (they have
inexpensive boards!) I avoided getting PCBs with a solder mask/silkscreen
manufactured until the design was proven. There is the chance that the
scan could have an error. So a prototype Altair was made using copper only
boards. Here are a few pictures of the prototype:
===============================
That is where I stop the kit story for this post. There IS more on the
website if you're interested. So, in the end, what did I get? I WAS ABLE
TO MAKE MY KIT!!!!!!!!!! : ) Of course, I had to MAKE the kit first... ; )
http://www.altairkit.com/images/061119-completed_altair_1974.jpg
I'm working on a few other vintage computer related projects. I hope that
I am able to provide other people with the same experience. : ) Hobby
electronics kits like this won't last forever, especially these old ones
with all of the old discontinued parts. Enjoy while it lasts!
Grant
Thanks for all of the comments guys. :) I had hard time getting on here
or I would have responded sooner. :) I'm glad that people who wrote about
it seemed to like it. I have ordered parts for 20 and will be selling them
again for a reduced price (compared to the ebay auctions).
I'm looking forward to making other kits of other systems. I also have a
few original projects, like a 19,008 LED bit mapped display. Blinkin'
light Pong anyone?
>The outside looks very cool and pretty accurate, though I'm not
>entirely sure if the number of connector punchouts on the rear panel
>is correct..
The case is mechanically identical. The rear panel is the same as my
221846K (that Altair was used as the source for the kit). I didn't even
know what the two 1/4" holes under the DB25s were for until after I had
received the first case. In fact, I didn't even remember noticing
them! They are for the cassette interface. :)
>But the solder-masked boards are wrong, at least for
>the vintage Altair that I own(no masking, just tinned traces).
I thought this too, and did it to make mine different...however I recently
saw an 8800 on ebay with a green mask! It might have been a rev1 or even
rev2 board. The source boards did not have a solder mask. I made the mask
because I thought it was an improvement (and because it makes things a
little different).
>OTOH, the crappy stranded white wire to connect the CPU board to the
>front panel is a nice "authentic" touch. I envied the guys with >Imsai
boxes...
Thats part of the experience that you're paying for when you get the kit! ;)
Grant
From: Gene Ehrich <ygehrich at yahoo.com>
>>With 12338 positives? Thats a 99.1 percent approval rating.
>>Quite respectable.
>
>If 108 people are unhappy enough to leave a negative I dont care what
>the percentages are he's a crook
So you're bad at human nature as well as math.
