Hi Guys,
I am trying to get my PDP-11/60 up and running,
and I very much like to read the Processor Technical Manual.
It?s ?name? is EK-KD11K-TM and I am looking for a PDF of it.
I do have this manual on a microfiche, but reading a manual
>from the fiche reader screen is not much fun. Maybe I need
to find a municipal service that allows you to copy fiche images
one by one on A4 paper. The city of Venlo had that in the 1990ies,
and I used it to copy the cache manual of the 11/34 from fiche
to paper back then.
Thanks, Henk
In preparation of moving, I dug out a IBM 6150 PC-RT from my basement.
This was my first proper computer as a child, which was donated to me by
a local company that upgraded their CAD system. So it would be
interesting to bring it back to life.
The machine is equipped with an 320 MB ESDI, 10 MBit Baseband Ethernet
adapter and an IBM Megapel graphics adapter.
This baby was quite a sight in 1993 when I got it, with its elegant
console font designed by Knuth.
Now I'm trying to revive the old machine, but there are some hassles:
The hard disk seems to be stuck or the drives electronics are broken, it
does not spin up. As these drives are quite rare, I'm looking for the
SCSI card (Model 6lX700l). Is it right, the PC-RT can boot off SCSI?
While I made images of the install floppies, it seems the AIX base
system 2.0.0. disk #1 is missing. The AIXWindows floppies where not
imaged and seem to be unreadable. Otherwise all VRM/extendes svcs, etc
floppy images are at hand.
So there is a big pile of problems with this box, maybe someone can help
me out with parts and floppy images?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Peter
There's an Intergraph 751 system (VAX architecture apparently, including
hard disk, printer, and two rebadged DEC racks full of who knows what) free
to a good home in southern Wisconsin. Appears to be in not-great shape.
Unfortunately, it's been on Craigslist for a while and it sounds like the
owner's really fed up with it and wants it gone ASAP or a realty company
will take possession of it (and who knows what they'll do with it). He
originally said last Saturday, but in an email to me yesterday afternoon he
said it would have to be gone by today (7/29).
Also unfortunately, there have been several people besides myself emailing
the owner trying to arrange a pickup, and he hasn't responded to them. I
personally have no way to move or store it, so I've been trying to relay
what I hear from him to the one person I thought was in the best position
to take it.
The owner gave me his personal email address and phone number, and told me
the name of the realty company in case anyone wants to get it after it's
out of his hands; but I don't think it would be cool to post those details
here. So please let me know personally if you'd like those details.
https://janesville.craigslist.org/sys/d/evansville-intergraph-751/693621784…
--
Eric Christopherson
Hi all,
Someone on one of the Facebook vintage groups found an IBM 5160 with an MDA
display for sale in Australia, except that it's a bit odd in that the
machine had what appears to be an MDA card, the output of which is then
connected via a short external cable to the input on another card, and then
an output that card is what's actually hooked up to the monitor.
The only internal photo of the machine is very poor, unfortunately. I'm
reasonably confident that the "first" card in the "mystery" chain is MDA,
it's full-length and alongside the DE-shell video output has the usual
DB-25 for parallel. The "mystery" card is also full-length, and there's
another full-length card immediately adjacent to it with no external
connectors - that one could easily be RAM, or the hard disk controller etc.
but I suppose it's possible that the mystery item is actually a two-card
set.
Anyway, any guesses as to what it might be? The implication is that the
mystery card adds functionality to the MDA card (reminiscent of 3DFX boards
years later), but of course is operating within the confines of what the
MDA display's capable of.
cheers
Jules
Hi folks,
I recently obtained a Tek 4006 from eBay as a repair/restoration project. It is missing a few keycaps (both SHIFT keycaps, COPY, LINE FEED, and :/*). In addition, one of the key mechanisms has a broken plunger. Last, the little green paddle line power toggle power switch at the back appears to be broken.
Pinging here to see if anybody has spares of these in their collection which they'd be willing to part with? Alternatively, recommendations on compatible key mechanisms/caps, or even 3D models to print some temporary replacements would be appreciated!
cheers,
--FritzM.
Does this mean that, like me scratching a bit at the package to expose
enough nub of broken-off pin to get a blob of solder on to hold a new
leg made of wire can theoretically be extended to shaving off the top
of the package to expose the IC and then tack soldering the severed
wire back onto it?
This would probably require some serious equipment I don't have, but
sounds possible in extremity.
RSVP
YHOSvt.
** TNM **
Dwight said:
"Message: 6
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 05:52:31 +0000
From: dwight <dkelvey at hotmail.com>
To: Pete Rittwage <peter at rittwage.com>, "General Discussion: On-Topic
and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: Resurrecting integrated circuits by cooking them.
Message-ID:
<
BYAPR01MB5608F4C8A3860C2A7D2BC172A3C10 at BYAPR01MB5608.prod.exchangelabs.com
>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
"Failure of the POKEY chip were likely bonding wire failures. Voltage
stress failures are not likely to self repair.
I would agree, the fix is likely temporary.
Many early chips used gold wire for bonding but later chips used
aluminum. Which is better is always a question. The pads on the die
were usually aluminum, while the package was often gold. These are
acoustically bonded.
One wonders if one put a capacitor on the lead with a non-lethal
voltage and used such a heating method, it might be able to arc weld
the wire back on. Using the method of heating might enhance the success
as well.
Dwight"
> From: Douglas Taylor
> I'm putting together a MicroPDP-11/23 in a BA23 box. Have the M8189 CPU
> quad width board and the bulkhead cabinet kit .. how the cabling goes
> from the M8189 CPU board to the bulkhead cabinet kit?
I _think_ this might be the cable you need:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/CK-KDF11-CABLE-ONLY-P-N-70-20451-1C/151622708242
but I'm not familiar with the cab kit, so I'm not sure.
> The 10 pin connectors on the CPU board don't seem to be keyed ...
> Is there something that gives the orientation away?
These 10 pin EIA connectors (same in the DLV11-J, KDJ11-B, etc) are keyed,
with a missing pin. DEC cables for these connectors have a plug in the
matching hole.
> From: Glen Slick
> In the photos that I have found of the M8189 console panel there is a
> '1' just above the top right of the 20-pin connector indicating Pin 1.
> A trace can be seen leading from that pin to the baud rate circuitry.
> So that pin would go to Pin 1 of one of the 10-pin connectors on the M8189.
Y'all love to re-invent the wheel, I see:
http://gunkies.org/wiki/DEC_asynchronous_serial_line_pinout#10_pin_header
I should check to see if the KDJ11-B has the same external baud rate
selection support, and if so, update the page to add it.
Oh, that's the other way to tell the orientation, with non-flat-cable cables;
with the loopback jumper on pins 7&9.
Noel
I pulled my Pro380 out of storage after getting a replacement
VR201 monitor. I connected it all together and on powerup I
get the following display:
http://www.dittman.net/pro380/screen.jpg
The tech manual says this is an error from slot 1 (the hard
drive controller) and the error is "Non-existent memory trap
occurred for longer than 20 seconds".
I reseated all the cards. I noticed three ICs are missing on
the hard drive controller but I don't know if they are empty
or someone removed the ICs (I can't remember where I got this
system). I can't find a picture of the controller to compare.
The missing ICs can be seen here:
http://www.dittman.net/pro380/missingics.jpg
These are the installed option cards:
http://www.dittman.net/pro380/cards.jpg
Any ideas?
--
Eric Dittman
I'm putting together a MicroPDP-11/23 in a BA23 box.? Have the M8189 CPU
quad width board and the bulkhead cabinet kit, with two DB25 connectors
and switches to set the baud rate.? On bitsavers the 'MicroPDP11 system
technical manual' shows how to set jumpers on the M8189 to allow this
cabkit set the baud rate, but only briefly mentions the cables needed.
Does anyone here have a anatomically correct MicroPDP-11/23+ in a BA23
box and can tell me how the cabling goes from the M8189 CPU board to the
bulkhead cabinet kit?
Doug
I'm posting a private email (anonymized) and my reply because it's a
significant issue.
>{Note private reply}
>
> > When the scanning process involves destruction of the original work
> > ... But if it's a rare document, or even maybe so rare that it's the
> > last one, then destroying it now just to produce a digital copy
> > inadequate to the aims of cultural preservation - that's a crime.
> > One right up there with genocide
>
>While I agree that making a non-optimal digital copy in such cases, is,
>well, non-optimal (because for _many uses_, the basic information is still
>available, wheras for many important documents, not even that remains),
>there's no way it's "right up there with genocide" - and if you really
>think so, you definitely need to examine your sense of scale, because it's
>seriously defective.
>
> [name removed]
I agree that when historical documents are lost without even any kind of
digital copy made, that's the worst.
However I was pretty careful to preceded that quoted paragraph with conditionals.
Specifically referring to a case where someone has a rare work, that isn't
in danger of falling apart, and there's no good reason why they couldn't
wait till better scanning methods became available, and they destroy it to
produce a crappy quality digital image. Thus ensuring there can never be
a high quality digital copy and the rare physical original is forever gone.
That's criminal. A high level crime against humankind. Where it's done in
bulk to entire collections, it _is_ the cultural equivalent of genocide.
I don't care if you disagree.
Could it be that you are upset because you do this (destroy docs), and don't
like to be accused of being a criminal?
I am sure that the future WON'T take your position on this. They are going
to be sooo pissed, that so many old works were destroyed and all they have
left is crappy quality horrible-looking two-tone scans.
This is _already_ the case with many electronics instrument manuals. There are
so many people who think that the physical manuscript is unimportant, and nothing
matters other than posting a minimally readable smallest-possible-file online,
with the least effort and so it's OK to destroy the original for convenience.
Private reply noted. Still going to repost on the list, as from anon.
Guy