Kai Kaltenbach wrote:
>Other front panels... hmm.
>
>The Ithaca InterSystems DPS-1 had one.
>
I still have a DPS-1 in (mostly) good shape. Unlike the IMSAI flat toggle
switches it had the triangular ones like DEC PDP-15s. Personally I
preferred the IMSAI ones (memories of bloody fingers after toggling in a
long binary on an Altair front panel with it's knife edged switches). The
DPS-1 works but the motherboard connectors are shot...I got it from a
plating/foundry company, covered with crud from the sufuric acid vats next
to it. Now if anyone has a nice new pristine Morrow 20 slot motherboard to
replace the "etched" one...
The other nice feature of the DPS-1 was an o-scope trigger mode on the front
panel, sort of a poor man's one channel logic analyzer. If I remember
correctly, it also knew something about 24-bit addresses.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yowza! [SMTP:yowza@yowza.com]
> Besides the Apple 1, does anybody know of a computer system that has
> actually appreciated in value? :-)
>
I assume you mean machines that are worth more than their original purchase
price. That would be a pretty short list... notably:
- IMSAI 8080 (assuming a base system; a fully configured setup would have
cost thousands)
- MOSTech KIM-1 (it was so cheap originally it can hardly avoid appreciating
since it's a significant historical piece)
- Rockwell AIM-65 (ditto)
- RCA COSMAC VIP (ditto)
If we adjust 1970s dollars to today's rate, not even the Altairs go for more
than the purchase price. That leaves only the Apple I in the appreciating
column.
The only other micro systems (besides the Altair 8800s & Apple I) that fetch
significant money, but are nowhere near appreciating from original cost,
are:
- IBM 5100
- Altair 680
- Processor Technology SOL
- Commodore PET (chiclet version)
- Apple Lisa
- Unproduced prototypes of Atari 8-bit or Commodore equipment
Kai
Regarding the three Altair machines that were recently posted
to the net auction at ebay.com - they went from $1525 to $2025.
Mind you, these weren't complete systems. The software, extra
drives, etc. were auctioned separately.
- John
Jefferson Computer Museum <http://www.threedee.com/jcm>
On Mon, 23 Feb 1998, Sam Ismail Replied:
>> I also had one homebrew S-100 with the Wameco front panel, which used hex
>> displays for address and data but otherwise was identical to the IMSAI
front
>> panel. Does anyone remember other front panel S-100 cards besides MITS,
>> IMSAI, Ithaca, and Wameco? Wasn't there a Byte-8 sold by Olson
Electronics
>> for a while that also had a front panel?
>Yes, the Byte-8 had a front panel with, I believe, a hex keypad and a two
>digit 7-segment LED display.
Was that just a display driven from a boot ROM or was it a real front panel,
with displays directly driven from the bus, examine/deposit, single step,
etc.? Usually a hex keypad meant a simulated front panel (CPU actually
running a debug program in the boot ROM). A true front panel needed 16 LEDs
or 4 hex digits for address, 8 LEDs or 2 hex digits for data, and at least 8
status LEDs for bus signals (SINP, SOUT, MEMR, INTA, etc.). All the panels
I have seen also had an extra 8 LED latched output port and sense switch
input port.
>From cad at Mon Feb 23 17:06:14 1998
From: cad at (Charles A. Davis)
Date: Sun Feb 27 18:32:11 2005
Subject: front panels
References: <61AC5C9A4B9CD11181A200805F57CD54D09C92(a)red-msg-44.dns.microsoft.com>
Message-ID: <34F200E6.40C2(a)gamewood.net>
And then there is the Astral 2000.
Full front panel (16 address/data switches, 16 leds) and a 4 digit hex
display also. Switches to 'load' address or data, run/step, int. etc.
When the machine is running normaly, the hex display is used as a
'clock'
This machine uses a MC6800 chip.
Chuck
--
-----------------------------------------------------------
He, who will not reason, is a bigot; William Drumond,
he, who cannot, is a fool; Scottish writer
and he, who dares not, is a slave. (1585-1649)
While he that does, is a free man! Joseph P. 1955-
-----------------------------------------------------------
(be sure to correct the return address when using 'reply')
Chuck Davis / Sutherlin Industries FAX # (804) 799-0940
1973 Reeves Mill Road E-Mail -- cad(a)gamewood.net
Sutherlin, Virginia 24594 Voice # (804) 799-5803
>Yes, the Byte-8 had a front panel with, I believe, a hex keypad and
a two
>digit 7-segment LED display.
The Byte Systems' BYT-8 didn't have a keypad or LED display, just 24 toggle
switches and the usual binary LEDs. The front panel plugs directly into the
backplane.
> On Mon, 23 Feb 1998, Jack Peacock wrote:
> Does anyone remember other front panel S-100 cards besides MITS,
> IMSAI, Ithaca, and Wameco? Wasn't there a Byte-8 sold by Olson
Electronics
> for a while that also had a front panel?
Other front panels... hmm.
The Ithaca InterSystems DPS-1 had one.
Somewhere kicking around I do have another "front panel" card that could
hardly have been used as a literal front panel... I believe it was made by
Jameco or somesuch. It's a full-and-a-half-length S-100 Z80 single board
computer card (it's so long, it couldn't have fit in any case) with several
segments of alpha display, and a 24- or 30-key keyboard-style keypad.
Kai
I was just given a Panasonic Exec. Partner. It looks like a laptop on
stearoids. It should have been called a lugtop. It has a red plasma
display, full keyboard, twin 5 1/4" floppy drives and a built-in
printer. It comes with a convenient folding handle that swings out of
the way (so as to not destroy its sleek lines presumeably) and boots
fine. Unfortunately no paper came with it so I'd appreciate any
information on when this was marketed. It's PC DOS compatible so that
dates it post 1981 at least.
Marty Mintzell
<From: "Daniel A. Seagraves" <DSEAGRAV(a)toad.xkl.com>
<KL0: 176510 300 <<< What is that?
real time clock or line time clock
<DM0: 170500 440 DH0
DM is the DH mux and is 8lines
<KB9:KB24 disabled - no DH0: controller
You have to have 3 controllers for that many lines I believe and it only
found one.
<And wasn't DM0: a disk controller? Am I supposed to reset the CSRs to th
Its that DH muxed serial line thing you looking for. you may have set
CSRs though Tim S may know the specifics for U-bus.
Allison
Roger Ivie <IVIE(a)cc.usu.edu> wrote:
>On the other hand, CP/M-68K is available from http://cdl.uta.edu/cpm/.
>A lot of it is written in C; with some work, it can be modernized and
>updated. What could be more retro than building the ability to port
>CP/M to anything with a C compiler?
Darn, I had this idea, too. I was going to port it to the Palm Pilot.
I looked at the code, and discovered a few things that the owner of
that page (Tim Olmstead) hadn't found.
I think CP/M-68K was cross-compiled under Alcyon C on a VAX 11/780.
(Alcyon also produced an OS called Regulus that was available
for Smoke Signal Broadcasting's 68000 systems.)
The source contains the name "Tom Saulpaugh", and a web search
turned up a book "The JavaOS? Design and Architecture" he wrote.
He's at Sun as the architect of JavaOS for Network Computers.
Tom Mason also works at Sun, and he worked at DRI on CPM-86,
Concurrent CPM-86, and CP/M-86+.
Novell appears willing to release source, but Tim suspects that
there's no one around willing to discover or document what's
available - if anything. For example, the source to CBASIC
should be around, but they haven't released it.
- John
Jefferson Computer Museum <http://www.threedee.com/jcm>
<No, it's just something about REALLY LARGE frontpanel boxes that rules.
<The KA-10 is plain awesome. It's not only a real good hack, but it's
<the foundation of timesharing and the ARPAnet. I'll probably never see o
<in action, so I'm amassing as much information as I can - maybe it can b
I have and it's more than awesome.
<re-built? Who knows, they used discrete components...
Half the problem is finding one that is complete enough with minimim
peripherals. The peripherals also eat power. just the cpu with a hack
to use modern disks for power and space savings wouldn't be out of line.
As to being discrete, the answer is mostly not completely. It's a
hackable machine.
<Of course, this is WAY out of my league, but if I keep docs around...
You never know.
Allison
On the subject of BBC video problems, it occurs to me that the BBC micro
does scrolling by moving the pointer to the start of the screen (under
some conditions?). If you can get it to do this, and see how the
display behaves, you may be able to determine easily if it's an
addressing problem.
Just a thought.
Philip.