6 Oct
2002
6 Oct
'02
3:40 a.m.
On Wednesday 02 October 2002 20:47, Jeffrey Sharp wrote:
On Wednesday, October 2, 2002, Geoff Roberts wrote:
> From: "Zane H. Healy" <healyzh(a)aracnet.com>
>
> > > 'cause when Windoze 95 becomes on topic, it just might not be fun
> > > anymore.
Would anyone object to adding an official 'cool
factor clause' to the
10-year rule? We already sorta have that now, where a newer computer
(e.g. mid-90s SGI MIPS) has sufficient cool factor that we're ok with
it. All we need is a concept of negative cool factor, so that some
computers (e.g. Packard Bell PC) might never be on-topic.
I have a PB that I keep as a sample of bad design, along with the IBM
Aptiva, and AST Bravo.