On Fri, 30 Jan 1998 SUPRDAVE(a)aol.com wrote:
  look inside your ][+ and see if you have a
language card. if so, you have the
 64k needed to run prodos. the latest and greatest version of prodos 8 won't
 run on a ][+ i think, only an enjanced //e.  if you dont, you can only run dos
 3.3  i myself prefer both. i remember when prodos first came out and everyone
 had an issue with the restrictive 15 character limit for filenames. that was
 back before i worked with mess-dos and that 8.3 filename limit... 
 The silliest thing they did was restrict spaces in filenames.  You had to
 use a period instead.  Blech.  Its funny when you think about it.
 Intuitively and I'm sure without really think about it, Apple developed a
 very human interface with DOS by allowing one to save files with very
 readable names.  Ie: "BIORHYTHM PROGRAM" or "PROGRAM TO BALANCE
CHECKBOOK"
 (30 character limit).  Then with ProDOS, they regressed into the
 function-forces-form syndrome by limiting filenames to 15 characters and
 requiring periods in place of spaces. 
 Under Apple DOS 3.3, you can have anything in a filename you want.
 Control characters, inverse/flashing, the works.  Makes for some
 pretty neat CATALOG listings, and is actually semi-workable as
 a "security through obscurity" step (though every Junior High kid
 knew how to bypass it...)
 DOS 3.3 made it easy and convenient to access filenames with embedded
 spaces.  Too bad Unix shell command lines are traditionally brain-damaged
 such that spaces in filenames must be quoted.