27 Jun
2001
27 Jun
'01
5:36 a.m.
Ethan Dicks wrote:
--- Eric Chomko <chomko(a)greenbelt.com> wrote:
Well I suspect that the 1% rule means that a system is a) not rare, and b)
totally
obsolete in the sense that all its functionality can be had in newer machines
(more
at superset).
I'm trying to think of a coin collecting equivalent and can only think of coins
sold by the
pound (weight). Many coin dealers actually buy foreign coins that way.
I was think that ISA cards could trade that way (weight).
Ethan Dicks wrote:
I just re-read this and wanted to make sure I understood... did you mean
it was worth _as much_ as $100 or _no more than_ $100? My assertion is
the *max* value after 10 years tends towards 1%. It's a rough guide, not
an inviolate figure, but for estimation, the real numbers should be closer
to 1% than, say, 5%. ...the 1% rule - ten years later, you can get a
computer for 1% of its
original purchase price.
Wait now, my Mac II fx, was $10,000 when it came out, that means its worth
$100 today?
This rule seperates computers from other forms of manufactured goods because
they are rarely worth 1% or less while still functioning. Think of a car.
No, actually a car IS a good example. What is the value (scrap) of a cubed car?
Is a 10-year-old car worth 1%? Probably closer to 10%, maybe as much as 20%
(collectables notwithstanding here). Is there ever a time in a car's life
when it is worth 1% and still running? I doubt it, but I'm willing to
entertain exceptions.
'Still running' does make a difference. And 'still running' computers
obviously
are worth more than scrap, IMO. But it seems that many of them (still running
computers) do get
scrapped.
Eric
-ethan
=====
Visit "The Seventh Continent"
http://penguincentral.com/penguincentral.html
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/