Given enough spare time and some guidance I can connect my VAX 3540
to HECnet. I have a DMR11 that I can put in the VAX, a synchronous
null-modem, and a KDP that can go in the KS10. This would
theoretically get a PDP10 on HECnet.
At 07:05 PM 12/8/2005, Julian Wolfe wrote:
 Yeah, as soon as I get my TK50 or one of my 9 tracks
working I'm going to
load DECnet/E, and then hopefully put my 11/23plus up on HECnet.
It would be neat if we could get the guy running the DEC 10 on pdpplanet to
link up to us also.
I think this'll pick up steam as it rolls downhill, as most net trends do.
Once people see that there are several machines on the network, it'll become
larger.
I gotta say, it sure would be cool to have my installation of DECmail
connected with other systems across the globe.
 > -----Original Message-----
 > From: cctalk-bounces at 
classiccmp.org [mailto:cctalk-bounces at 
classiccmp.org]
 > On Behalf Of Robert Armstrong
 > Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 5:41 PM
 > To: 'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts'
 > Subject: A Hobbyist DECnet Network
 >
 >
 >   I'm interested in setting up a network of hobbyist DEC machines linked
 > together in a DECnet phase IV network.  Why?  I suppose there's no really
 > good reason, but it seems like it would be fun to be able to do "SHOW NET"
 > or "NCP SHOW ACTIVE NODES" and see a whole long list of machines that
 > aren't
 > mine :-)  Besides, it would be a good way to share access to real,
 > non-simulated, VMS/RSX/RSTS and even, maybe, TOPS-10 or 20, machines.
 >
 >   Does anyone else agree?  Is anyone else interested in participating?
 >
 >   I know I'm not the first to think of this; in particular, I've had a few
 > email discussions recently with Johnny Billquist about HECnet,
 >
 >       
http://www.update.uu.se/~bqt/hecnet.html
 >
 > At some point I'd like to link up with HECnet, but right now Johnny is
 > having ISP problems and it sounds like HECnet is down to one or two nodes.
 >
 >   Are there any other hobbyist DECnet associations that are going strong?
 >
 >   As for technology, it seems like the best thing would be to use the
 > Internet as our communications medium.  Nobody wants to pay for
 > point-to-point leased lines anymore, after all.  Multinet, TCPware, and
 > even
 > DECNet Phase V all have the ability to send DECnet traffic over IP.  Right
 > now I'm leaning towards Multinet - they have a free hobbyist license
 > program, and Multinet can create point-to-point virtual DECnet circuits
 > using UDP packets that can be routed over the Internet.  They're simple to
 > set up and administer.
 >
 >   I have a fair amount of Internet bandwidth available at my location, and
 > I
 > can set aside a VS4000 VLC or model 90 to serve as a dedicated Phase IV
 > routing node.
 >
 > Bob Armstrong
 >
 >