16 May
2004
16 May
'04
11:59 a.m.
Tony Duell wrote:
There is, I believe, a reason for it. Originally (the design is something
like 50 years old), it was all Whitworth for the large size bolts and BA
for the small stuff. That was, of course, typical for British engineering
at that them.
More recently they found that Whitworth allen-head screws were _much_
more expensive than the equivalent metric ones. So they went over to
metric for things like the bolts holding the headstock to the bed, but
kept Whitworth for the bolts used in the T-slots of the cross-slide, for
the spindle thread, etc. THat was so all accessories fitted all machines.
After all, if you buy a lathe, you expect to be able to get bits to fit
it in 10 or 20 years time (the computer industry could learn a lot from
this....)
So *that's* what they were thinkin'! :)
Thanks, Tony!
However, since Triumph was firmly in the "nothing from Model A Year X
fits any other year or model" group, I don't think the reasoning carries
across. "Too cheap to retool all at once" comes to mind.
Doc