To go back to the topic...
Whoever posted the link to the "Ultimate Steal," Thank You! Just ordered a
copy, as this is my first year in college.
And more to the off topic argument of what's better: Linux or Windows. In my
opinion, its a moronic argument to have. They are two totally different
animals. Its just a matter of personal preference.
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 10:15 PM, Ray Arachelian <ray at arachelian.com> wrote:
  Quit trolling.
 1. I responded to your original message about an educational version of
 various MSFT software with how one can get free CD's of Linux without
 any need of an educational discount.
 2. You claimed various unrelated things, repeating how you work at a
 multi billion dollar company that has so many desktops and how it
 wouldn't work there - the topic was about educational discounts - had
 nothing to do with who you work for, their SOX needs, or how many
 systems they manage or how much support they require.
 Bringing up who you work for (or rather how much money flows through
 them), how many desktops they have, what their support or Sarbanes-Oxley
 needs has what to do with an educational discount that Microsoft puts
 out and a counter of Linux and Open Office are both cheaper and better?
 IMHO, it's condescending, as if to say "they pros won't use Linux"
which
 is plainly false.  I know for a fact that large financial companies who
 probably make far more multi-billions than yours do use Linux, and
 Solaris, and AIX and many other OS's.  Arguing based on that line of
 thinking simply shows you're switching tactics, away from the core
 discussion because you realize you're wrong.
 3. No one cares whether or not your kids or wife (or for that matter
 mine) will run Linux, or Windows other than you and them.  The option is
 there, you just seem unwilling to support them, if they chose to go that
 route.
 As a data point, my 4 year old can use Linux - he's using an old 650Mhz
 Celeron running Edubuntu.  Yes, I provide him with support and lots of
 games, all of which are free.  That I'm able and willing to provide such
 support for my family members and you're not does not say anything about
 the complexity of Linux vs Windows, but rather than my willingness vs
 yours.
 I say this, since you've claimed that you've been using Linux and
 FreeBSD for ages now - which I'd call out as suspicious since, if you
 really had, you'd be able to provide such support.
 Perhaps your experience with these is limited to FreeBSD 2.x and Hylafax
 in 1997 - a lot of things have changed since then.  Give current
 versions of Linux a try before bashing them and limiting your view to
 whatever the EEE PC happened to ship with.
 OTOH, I'm forced to use XP at work and it's a horrible dog.  The very
 same hardware runs Linux much, much faster, and it's far better behaved,
 supports all the hardware on the same machine, is secure, and safe.  Not
 to mention free, with lots of free updates, no activation, and comes
 with tons of other free software.
 4. I did follow the discussion, but I wasn't going to let some free
 advertisement for Microsoft software slide without pointing out that
 there Linux can be had, not only for free as a download but also on CD.
 The timing of your original post and my "Hey, by the way, you can get
 Linux, it's good and it's free" is irrelevant to anything you've said.
 Messages on mailing lists do not have expiration dates - and on a
 mailing list that discusses 20 and 30 year old machines, it's laughable
 to think that 10 days somehow makes any difference.
 5. The words "Put the Asus EEE PC with Linux next to version with XP /
 Vista, and there is NO comparison - it even LOOKS like a cartoony toy"
 do not make it sound like you're comparing Linux running on an Asus PC
 vs to XP running on an Asus PC.  So you've had a typo there - that
 opened up the door to multiple interpretations.  I think that perhaps
 now you've meant "next to (a) version (of the EEE PC) with XP / Vista"
 rather than what I misread as another machine.
 My apologies - it appeared to me that you were comparing the version of
 Linux that ships with the EEE PC with any version of XP/Vista on another
 machine, and somehow saying the EEE PC was a toy because it ran Linux,
 not comparing Linux and XP/Vista on the same machine.
 But it's still not a valid comparison.  Most folks who run Linux are
 going to run one with either KDE or GNOME and they're not gonna have it
 setup to look like a toy.  Perhaps the marketing folks of the EEE PC
 thought that it would attract teenagers or kids (which oddly does kinda
 tug back towards the educational market and away from "multi-billion
 dollar company" and support contracts.)
 Go install "Bob" on top of Windows and see how professional that looks.
 :-)  Some poorly configured desktop manager you choose as a strawman
 shouldn't be the deciding factor as to what OS someone else should run.
 I could probably set up Bob to launch Word and laugh at it the same way,
 thus calling Windows a toy just the same - but would that mean very much?
 There are other distros with other UI's, some more professional looking
 than Vista.
 
http://art.gnome.org/preview.php?image=screenshots/gnome218/DarkFire2.jpg
 http://art.gnome.org/preview.php?image=screenshots/gnome218/DarkFire.jpg
 http://art.gnome.org/preview.php?image=screenshots/gnome218/UbuntuCompizAWN…
 http://art.gnome.org/preview.php?image=screenshots/gnome218/CurretnSetup.jpg
 http://www.xfce.org/images/about/screenshots/4.4-1.png
 http://www.xfce.org/images/about/screenshots/4.4-2.png
 http://www.xfce.org/images/about/screenshots/4.4-6.png
 http://polishlinux.org/reviews/kde-4-1-rev-777000/a1405b89b3819b74546ddfa2f…
 http://polishlinux.org/reviews/kde-4-1-rev-777000/fd039fbc84988beba6c0ae228…
 http://liquidat.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/dolphin-selection.png
 http://liquidat.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/kde-pim-kde4.png
 http://liquidat.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/marble-mercator.png
 Go compare XP to Suse, Fedora, Ubuntu, or Debian instead.  If you're the
 GUI candy kinda guy, configure those with KDE 4.1.  If you've got some
 old poor PC that's sitting in a closet somewhere, maybe you can try Damn
 Small Linux or a distro with XFCE such as Xubuntu and see if you might
 put it to some good use instead of languishing away just because windows
 is too slow on it.
 Note that you can do the same for FreeBSD (or OpenSolaris, etc.).  It's
 not just Linux that's a valid choice.
 And you know what, if this is the EEE PC version of Linux:
 
http://www.linuxlinks.com/article/20071204172028328/Asus-701-Internet.html
 it doesn't look any uglier (or toy like) than this:
 
http://techrepublic.com.com/2347-10878_11-4395-4410.html?seq=15
  This is the EXACT reason that Doc said to drop
the issue...
 When someone like you has no decent argument, they need to resort to
 insulting and name-calling.
 
 Either that, or they try to change the subject from the topic of an
 educational discount (presumably for college kids) to all sorts of other
 things such as Office 2007 incompatibility with Open Office, or that how
 multi-billion dollar companies run their IT departments, or comparing
 OS's on "toy" computers?  :-D
 Of course, you can always accuse me of this: 
http://xkcd.com/386/  :-)