17 Apr
2011
17 Apr
'11
7:59 p.m.
On 4/17/11 10:22 PM, Philip Pemberton wrote:
For bonus points, the whole thing is linked against an
ancient X11
library which can't deal with DISPLAY= strings of the form ":0.0". You
have to lose the ".0" or ISE segfaults.
Ok, this is crazy. I've used ":0.0" since probably X11R3, that was
twenty years ago. I know of no X Consortium release of X11 that didn't
take ":0.0", ever. How did they manage to break that?
I've got a bunch of XC9500 and XC9500XL parts. The
XLs are really,
really nice -- 3.3V with 5V-tolerant-and-compatible I/O, 100MHz toggle
rate, and a piece of cake to design for. I learned Verilog with a
homebrew XC9572XL development board...
I've used a bunch of XC9500s, I love 'em.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Port Charlotte, FL