9 Dec
2003
9 Dec
'03
3:35 p.m.
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Cameron Kaiser wrote:
...and I, in turn, have been using pine for a number of years
without becoming aware of any similar reception problems. I have
had folks comment on a missing attachment, but only when I forgot
to attach it :(
- don
> So do I
-- "be generous in what you accept and strict in what you
> create" or similar words. On the other hand, RFC1049 doesn't allow the
> "Content-type:" that Tony's mail contains, nor does RFC822, and as you
> imply, Tony's mail isn't MIME-compliant -- so it's broken too.
So what do you want me to change? Should it be
text/plain? Or should I
remove that header line altogether (I am not going to totally upgrade my
mail software!). Or should I just stop posting here?
Probably should be text/plain. I note that you're using vanilla Elm (I'm
using the ME+ branch myself). --
---------------------------------- personal: http://www.armory.com/~spectre/ --
Cameron Kaiser, Floodgap Systems Ltd * So. Calif., USA * ckaiser(a)floodgap.com
-- Birth, n.: The first and direst of all disasters. -- Ambrose Bierce --------