On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Alexander Schreiber wrote:
  Well, according to 
http://bulk.fefe.de/scalability/ if
you want to run
 *BSD on x86, it should be FreeBSD. 
Did you see the news item referenced at the top of that web page?
http://bulk.fefe.de/scalability/#netbsd2
-> [Nov 1 2003] I got an email suggesting that I re-check NetBSD. The
-> results are nothing short of astonishing. In two weeks time the
-> NetBSD team made dramatic improvements.
->
->    * socket: previously O(n), now O(1).
->    * bind: greatly improved, but still O(n). Much less steep, though.
->    * fork: a modest O(n) for dynamically linked programs, O(1) for
->        statically linked.
->    * mmap: a bad O(n) before, now O(1) with a small O(n) shadow.
->    * touch after mmap: a bad strange graph in 1.6.1, a modest O(n) a
->        week ago, now O(1).
->    * http request latency: previously O(n), now O(1).
->
-> Congratulations, NetBSD! NetBSD now has better scalability than
-> FreeBSD.
-brian.