20 Sep
2001
20 Sep
'01
1:03 p.m.
At 12:08 PM 9/20/01, Emmanuel replied to my question
with :
(the VAX hardware reference), however this reference is unreliable when it
comes to VUPs ratings.
Eric has confirmed that it was correct on the ones I asked about, we
already had the 4000/100 vs 4000/90 vs 4000/700 discussions :-)
There are some inaccuracies, though. For instance, the /90 and /90A
are shown to have the same TPS, but the /90A is faster. The numbers
for the /90 and /90A are also wrong as far as I can tell (the numbers
more closely match what I first posted rather than what I determined
experimentally).
There's also a lot of holes in the list.
--
Eric Dittman
dittman(a)dittman.net
Check out the DEC Ethusiasts Club at http://www.dittman.net/
20 Sep
20 Sep
2:04 p.m.
So, please write to this guys
( abs(a)netbsd.org ) to change it, to complete it, whatever.
It took a while to get it where it is, but without any input, it stays
like it is !
cheers
Eric Dittman wrote:
At 12:08 PM 9/20/01, Emmanuel replied to my
question with :
(the VAX hardware reference), however this reference is unreliable when it
comes to VUPs ratings.
Eric has confirmed that it was correct on the ones I asked about, we
already had the 4000/100 vs 4000/90 vs 4000/700 discussions :-)
There are some inaccuracies, though. For instance, the /90 and /90A
are shown to have the same TPS, but the /90A is faster. The numbers
for the /90 and /90A are also wrong as far as I can tell (the numbers
more closely match what I first posted rather than what I determined
experimentally).
There's also a lot of holes in the list.
--
Eric Dittman
dittman(a)dittman.net
Check out the DEC Ethusiasts Club at http://www.dittman.net/
2:13 p.m.
Eric Dittman wrote:
There are some inaccuracies, though. For instance, the /90 and /90A
are shown to have the same TPS, but the /90A is faster. The numbers
for the /90 and /90A are also wrong as far as I can tell (the numbers
more closely match what I first posted rather than what I determined
experimentally).
One remark here. The TPS numbers not always seem to be "logical". Please
notice,
that a lot of the benchmark is influenced by the I/o & disk system. So a
faster CPU not always
has a better TPS number. You can see it many times if you really look
into it.
And, the 4000/90 & /90a are workstations. So TPS is not of so much value
to this ...
There's also a lot of holes in the list.
So fill them ;-)
cheers
8807
days inactive
8807
days old
2 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
dittman＠dittman.net -
emu＠ecubics.com