tothwolf at concentric.net
Wed Feb 18 15:07:27 CST 2015
On Wed, 18 Feb 2015, Mouse wrote:
>> 4) I'd love to know how you're getting cctech traffic, since I just
>> checked and you are most definitely not subscribed to that list.
>> Perhaps you are referring to cctech posts that are gated to cctalk and
>> the headers reflect that? It's valid list traffic.
> I don't know about the OP, but I've been getting duplicates of some
> mail. (Curiously, according to the Delivered-To: headers, both copies
> came through cctech, though the rest of the headers, like List-* and
> X-BeenThere, show cctalk for one copy and cctech for the other.)
> I once, back very soon after the list loss-and-recovery, tried to unsub
> from cctech and the automated system told me I wasn't subscribed - but,
> IIRC, it was using the envelope-from rather than the header-From: from
> my mail, so I'm not sure I entirely trust it.
> I just now put an example up on ftp.rodents-montreal.org; see
> /mouse/misc/classiccmp/msg-cctalk.txt and .../msg-cctech.txt for them.
I'm having the same issue. I was subscribed to cctalk only and began
getting emails from both cctalk and cctech after the list came back
online. It hasn't bothered me much since I just wrote a procmail rule to
filter it. I figured it would clear up once the list configuration stuff
More information about the cctalk