Reproducing old machines with newer technology (Re: PDP-12 at the RICM)
elson at pico-systems.com
Wed Jul 15 21:02:45 CDT 2015
On 07/15/2015 01:24 PM, Noel Chiappa wrote:
> > On 7/14/2015 7:36 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
> > On the system 360 CPUs, they did not use flip-flops like we are used
> > to, today. They used latches ... Since these were discrete transistor
> > implementations, a real flip-flop was too expensive, but a latch could
> > be implemented in about 6 transistors, I think.
> > The 11/45 used TTL ICs, so real FFs were available in that technology,
> > although they may have used latches as well.
> This confused me a bit, until I realized that you were using "latch" for what
> I think of as 'SR flip-flop', and "flip-flop" for 'D and JK flip-flops'.
> Guess that shows how long ago I did hardware... :-)
> To be a bit more detailed, on the 360's, were those latches 'simple' SR flops
> (i.e. un-gated), or were they gated?
Well, one would have to dig into the ALDs to be sure. But,
the FEMMs have some large drawings that are essentially RTL
in graphical form, and a lot of description of how it all
worked. My understanding is all those registers were
essentially D latches. So, they got one data input from the
ALU or a mux, and a latch pulse, and provided a Q output.
Each of these latches took up at least 4 SLT packages, I'm
not sure exactly how many for sure. So, the whole latch was
composed of something like 4 NOR gates or the equivalent,
plus one inverter.
(Sorry about being so vague, I read a bunch of IBM FEMMs
about a year ago when I had some spare time.)
More information about the cctalk