RE: Actually we want this Packard Bell http://www.smecc.org/itemsklkljl; _3.jpg
couryhouse at aol.com
Sat Jul 2 23:31:42 CDT 2016
I would like that 6 proc black cube......ed sharpe
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone
-------- Original message --------
From: Tothwolf <tothwolf at concentric.net>
Date: 7/2/2016 8:00 PM (GMT-07:00)
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: RE: Actually we want this Packard Bell
On Sat, 2 Jul 2016, Jay West wrote:
> Ed wrote...
> Not just any Packard Bell... just this one.
> it has a place due to form and design, certainly not performance.
> IMOO.... no place at all. If it had some kind of cult following, or lots of
> people remembered it, maybe.
> But I doubt most people (let alone collectors) would look at that and say
> "oh, I've seen that before!".
> Now... maybe as an example of how hard mfg's tried to differential via
> terrible case designs... ;)
I think the same could probably be said for something like that
6-processor Pentium Pro that was sold in the late 90s which had a black
cube style case and a stand which allowed it to sit on its corner. Very
unusual design with both the case and boards, but few people will have
seen, let alone used one. As far as utility goes, they are just about
worthless now, except to someone who wants to collect one for nostalgia
I myself wouldn't mind finding a Packard Bell Legend I (Intel 80286) only
because I once owned two of them (that were sold without my approval as a
pair to someone for $100, including the VGA monitors). The same also goes
for a Compaq Deskpro 386/20e (specifically the 'e' model) for similar
reasons. Both machines are not something all that useful from a utility
standpoint (I have dozens of late generation 486 and Pentium boards I
could put in a case which would be far more useful) but would be fun to
have just to tinker around with again.
More information about the cctalk