Dave Wade dave.g4ugm at
Mon May 30 03:10:48 CDT 2016

I think it depends on if you are already aware of the existence and purpose
of the hackaday web site. Having had one of my projects published there I am
aware of the site and wouldn't hesitate to click that link. On the other
hand, if I wasn't aware of the hackaday site I might think differently, the
word "hackaday" also has unsavoury connotations to some, so an explanation
would have been helpful...
.. lastly the latest bunch of malware I have seen post realistic looking
documents with real phone numbers from real people, horrible....

Dave Wade

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-bounces at] On Behalf Of Jay West
> Sent: 30 May 2016 04:47
> To: 'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts'
> <cctalk at>
> Subject: RE:
> century/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%
> 3A+hackaday%2FLgoM+%28Hack+a+Day%29&utm_content=FeedBurner+user+
> view
> Top posting because....
> It takes two (at least) to start it, and you certainly played your part.
> While it is not "forbidden" to just post a URL without any explanation, it
> be a good idea to include something with it so that we know if we want to
> on it or not. Otherwise, it's going to just be skipped by a lot of people
> might have had an interest but weren't interested in going there blindly.
> Regardless of if one agrees with fred or not, I think he stated his
> without being rude. Let's keep the namecalling and rudeness out of it.
> Nuff said.
> J
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-bounces at] On Behalf Of wulfman
> Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2016 8:55 PM
> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
<cctalk at>
> Subject: Re:
> century/?utm
> _source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+hackaday
> %2FLgoM+%28H
> ack+a+Day%29&utm_content=FeedBurner+user+view
> I did not start the fire.
> On 5/29/2016 6:43 PM, Fred Cisin wrote:
> > On Sun, 29 May 2016, wulfman wrote:
> >> You either have a stick up your ass, are too stupid to know the
> >> difference between a malware link and a real link OR both.
> >> Now go back to your worrying about the 0.00001% of links that contain
> >> malware.
> >
> > I'm glad to hear it.
> >
> > OK, initially, I was glad that you've never encountered it.
> > But, your current rude behavior changes that, to being glad that you
> > have that perception of it.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> --
> The contents of this e-mail and any attachments are intended solely for
the use
> of the named
> addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
> unauthorized use, copying, disclosure, or distribution of the contents of
this e-
> mail is strictly prohibited by the sender and may be unlawful. If you are
not the
> intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete this

More information about the cctalk mailing list