Kryoflux or Catweasle
pbirkel at gmail.com
Thu May 25 00:53:57 CDT 2017
>From: cctech [mailto:cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of ben via cctech
>Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 1:32 AM
>To: cctech at classiccmp.org
>Subject: Re: Kryoflux or Catweasle
>On 5/24/2017 7:19 PM, allison via cctech wrote:
>> I have a load of all of those... 2901Cs the faster ones. The 2901 tends
>> to force
>> the flavor of the hardware and instructions toward microcoded machine.
>But if you want 9 or 18 bits, 2901 is not the answer.
>A 74181 can be tricked in to being used as 3 bit alu.
Can you tell more about the 3-bit trick?
More information about the cctalk